To: Skooz
Nothing in the article suggests that the child was "out of control." The post you're quoting does not say the child was out of control. It says he was not in his mothers control. You can't control what you aren't looking at.
351 posted on
07/24/2006 11:07:00 AM PDT by
DJ MacWoW
(If you think you know what's coming next....You don't know Jack.)
To: DJ MacWoW
You can't control what you aren't looking at. Unless you have instilled obedience in your children, like your parents did with you and your siblings.
To: DJ MacWoW
The post you're quoting does not say the child was out of control. It says he was not in his mothers control. You can't control what you aren't looking at. You seem to read quite a bit into the few words in the article. It is quite possible to see something and hear it at the same time. And you are splitting hairs.
373 posted on
07/24/2006 11:24:04 AM PDT by
Skooz
(Chastity prays for me, piety sings...Modesty hides my thighs in her wings...)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson