Not true.
The discussion started like this:
Me: "It is likely that the mirror was hanging without much support and fell from the nails or clips which were used to secure it. If that is the case, in no way is it the parent's fault."
your response to that post: "The child was 3,why wasn't the boy in a cart under Moms control?"
You are (once again) making things up if you contend that I think it unreasonable that a mother would have her 3 year old in a cart. I don't think that is unreasonable at all.
What IS unreasonable is spurious accusations against the fitness of this mother based upon a very short article with few details.
Again, the mother was NOT looking at her child. She was not in control of the situation.
"It is likely that the mirror was hanging without much support
Your first post was wrong in it's assumption then.
From the article: when a floor-mounted mirror
You are (once again) making things up
Where have I invented anything? Link it.
In the beginning of the thread, posters were suggesting that the child be in a cart. Others disagreed. That started the debate.