Have you really read what I said?
I said: If he had been next to her, he wouldn't have been near the mirror.
That means it would have fallen and missed him.
This woman just lost her child and all you care about is painting her as a negligent parent ebcause she didn't do exactly what you deem she should have been doing.
She wasn't looking at him. A parent can't take their eyes off a child. There are heartbreaking consequences. This is tragically one of them.
You weren't there, I wasn't there, there is not enough information in the article to lay blame on ANYONE.
Only if you don't read the article.
And I said that if she had been next to him it could have fallen on BOTH of them. Or it could have fallen on someone else if neither the mother or child were standing there.
We have no clue WHY the mirror fell - but it did.