To: pablitonavaja; Excuse_My_Bellicosity
Your graph is interesting, but it was made by S. Baliunas and W. Soon, whose research was funded by Exxon. (emphasis added)
I hope you dont mean to discredit the work based upon corporate funding. To me, government and/or university funding may be more suspect. But it shouldnt matter who funds or who produces. What counts is the analysis itself.
94 posted on
07/23/2006 2:57:54 PM PDT by
ChessExpert
(Mohammed was not moderate)
To: ChessExpert
" I hope you dont mean to discredit the work based upon corporate funding."
that is rather funny considering Enron put 2 or 3 Billion dollars into trying to prove global warming is real.
95 posted on
07/23/2006 3:02:53 PM PDT by
Steve Van Doorn
(*in my best Eric cartman voice* “I love you guys”)
To: ChessExpert
Al Gore is so much more credible. I heard a great Gore soundbite on the radio on the radio about 10 years ago. The reporter asked Gore, "Research suggests that volcanoes put out 1000 times the CO2 that man-made things do. How is that less of an effect than cars and industry?" Al's answer was, "The wind blew it away?"
To: ChessExpert; pablitonavaja
If it was funded by Exxon, it's gotta be pure evil. I'm so impressed by the "research" done by the Sierra Club, Greenpeace, and Harvard University.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson