Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ShadowDancer
I thought judges can only interpret and rule on the constititionality of law as it implies. This must mean then the following is no longer true ...

1,049 federal rights depend on marital status. What the privilege of marriage buys you.

After being in a romantic partnership for almost eight years, after living together for four years, after jointly purchasing property, sharing bills and income, after having a ceremony during which we publicly declared our commitment to one another in front of all our friends and family, Terra and I are still denied 1,049 federal rights automatically granted to heterosexual, married couples. Rest of article can be found at: http://scribbling.net/1049-federal-rights-depend-on-marital-status Some of those rights include:

4 posted on 07/23/2006 5:10:52 AM PDT by moonman (`)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: moonman
1,049 federal rights depend on marital status.

Beep. Circle takes the square. Those are federal privileges, not rights. A right is something that, when exercised, puts no onus or obligation on another person.

That being said, "free association" is a right. Regardless of the religious or moral implications, these folks cohabitation has not engendered an obligation on the part of a third party.

6 posted on 07/23/2006 5:20:43 AM PDT by Junior (Identical fecal matter, alternate diurnal period)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: moonman

Can I ask why you went through all of that but did not marry?


8 posted on 07/23/2006 5:30:07 AM PDT by ShadowDancer (No autopsy, no foul.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson