1 posted on
07/22/2006 5:07:14 PM PDT by
Pokey78
To: Pokey78
And we know that the EU supports the terrorist and not Israel. They would be happy if the terrorist took over the land of Israel because that is what will happen unless Israel gets rid of the terrorist Hezdevils, and Hamdogs.
2 posted on
07/22/2006 5:12:17 PM PDT by
YOUGOTIT
To: Pokey78
I thought Blair was Prime minister of Britain. Wow, I guess I was mistaken. MSM will take any remark from anyone and attribute it to a whole nation. Way to go MSM, frickin' pukes!
3 posted on
07/22/2006 5:15:43 PM PDT by
calex59
(The '86 amnesty put us in the toilet, now the senate wants to flush it!)
To: Pokey78
publicly criticising Israel's military tactics and urging the Americans to 'understand' the price being paid by ordinary Lebanese civilians. Well then, the next time a terrorist group wants to rule, maybe the voting public will vote them out overwhelmingly. This is just a history lesson for the people of Lebanon and Palestine (as it may be). Accomodate terroists - pay the piper.
4 posted on
07/22/2006 5:18:10 PM PDT by
Go Gordon
(I don't know what your problem is, but I bet its hard to pronounce)
To: Pokey78
The British did not show "restraint" in the Falklands. Argentina never attacked the British Isles. Hezbollah has strafed and rocketed Israeli cities and Israel is determined to do everything in its power to repel that aggression. I'm sure Prime Minister Olmert did not detain Blair with a history lesson on what the British did in the 1930s when their army resorted to drastic measures to crush Arab terrorism in Palestine - measures Israel has not even begun to employ to deal with a far greater threat. So to sum things up, its time the UK got off its moral high horse. Israel is doing exactly what any other nation would do faced with the same set of circumstances.
(Go Israel, Go! Slap 'Em, Down Hezbullies. )
5 posted on
07/22/2006 5:21:05 PM PDT by
goldstategop
(In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
To: Pokey78
Proportionality must be measured against the requirement that a war be winnable; i.e., the probability of success. In other words, if one doesn't possess sufficient force to win the war, then the effort is immoral, and never should have been undertaken.
That means that just war, while it requires proportionality, implies that proportionality is to be sacrificed somewhat at the altar of RESOLUTION.
Collateral damage is not the measure of proportionality, either. The measure of proportionality is "necessity to accomplish the task."
In other words, Harry Truman's decision to use atomics was both proportional and it ensured a proper probability of success.
6 posted on
07/22/2006 5:23:49 PM PDT by
xzins
(Retired Army Chaplain and Proud of It! Supporting the troops means praying for them to WIN!)
To: Pokey78
Shut up you Eurotrash fool. Let the real men finish this fight while you hand wring safely in London.
8 posted on
07/22/2006 5:28:22 PM PDT by
MikeA
(Not voting out of anger in November is a vote for Nancy Pelosi as Speaker of the House)
To: Pokey78
The UK needs to realize that Chamberlain's path is not the road to follow now...no more than it was in the late 1930s. They need a stalwart Churchill to step forward.
10 posted on
07/22/2006 5:30:59 PM PDT by
Jeff Head
(God, family, country)
To: Pokey78
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1670642/posts
'Tory Homeland Security spokesman Patrick Mercer said: "There is little doubt that we are in danger from Hezbollah. I trust that the Government are more alive to this threat than they have been to other Islamist fundamentalist threats."'
The Brits are SCARED.
13 posted on
07/22/2006 5:36:02 PM PDT by
Fred Nerks
(Read the bio THE LIFE OF MUHAMMAD free! Click Fred Nerks for link to my Page.)
To: Pokey78
This is Israel's fight. When it's Britain's fight, will they bow down to whatever Israel says? Nope, didn't think so.
15 posted on
07/22/2006 5:59:09 PM PDT by
mtbopfuyn
(I think the border is kind of an artificial barrier - San Antonio councilwoman Patti Radle)
To: Pokey78
urging the Americans to 'understand' the price being paid by ordinary Lebanese civilians You mean the "ordinary Lebanese civilians" who have not only elected (yes, Lebanon is technically a democratic country) a government that is supportive of the Hezzie terrorists, but also celebrate every time the Hezzies launch a rocket into Israel?
22 posted on
07/22/2006 6:27:42 PM PDT by
TheBattman
(Islam (and liberalism)- the cult of a Cancer on Society)
To: Pokey78
To put disportionate into perspective in WWII there were about 95,000 American Battle dead vs. about 1.5 million japanese battle dead. Tit for Tat does not win you a war. I suppose these same people accusing Israel of responding disportionately would also like the condemn the U.S. for responding disportiontely in WWII.
To: Pokey78
If Israel had really targeted civilians as alleged by western Europeans, the death toll would be in the hundreds of thousands by now. Western Europeans are lying by exaggeration and omission, because they hate the people of Israel. They want to stop Israelis from defending themselves again, while seeing to it that no one restrains the Islamist nations.
37 posted on
07/23/2006 6:33:56 AM PDT by
familyop
(Essayons)
To: Pokey78
When Reagan told Israel to get out of Lebanon what was the end result?
Today.
40 posted on
07/23/2006 6:43:10 AM PDT by
funkywbr
To: Pokey78
Lets get this straight...
This has been comments from SOME British ministers.
Britain OFFICIALLY is supporting the American stance on Israel.
Please do not equate Kim Howells etc to all of us...
To: Pokey78
Israel is just doing the job the U seless N ations refuses to do.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson