Yes, but it's still one of those "although the facts behind the release are now seen to be totally bogus, the main thrust of our argument remains completely correct" corrections.
I suppose they don't know how to write any other type of correction.
Jack
Add to that that this story was about the DA acknowledging inaccurate information that was presented in their press release - yet the details of the original crime were recapped, and in such a way as to infer that the questioning of those same false facts was, in some way, a show of support for the cop-killing-gun wielding criminals.