Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Disability Rights Advocate Backs Bush Embryonic Stem Cell Research Bill Veto (Joni Eareckson Tada)
Life News ^ | 7/20/06 | Steven Ertelt

Posted on 07/22/2006 9:46:57 AM PDT by wagglebee


Washington, DC (LifeNews.com) -- A disability rights advocate who has been a spinal cord injured quadriplegic for nearly four decades says she is happy President Bush vetoed a bill that would have forced taxpayers to fund embryonic stem cell research. Joni Eareckson Tada was among those gathered at the White House as the president announced why he vetoed the measure.

Joining fellow disability advocates, ethicists, researchers, theologians and legislators, Tada said she stands with "countless Americans with disabilities who believe that our cause is not advanced when human life is sacrificed in hopes of finding a cure."

"People like me -- who are medically fragile -- are left vulnerable and exposed in a society that views human life as a commodity which can be experimented upon or exploited," she explained.

Tada said the disability community has another vested interest in the Presidential veto. Despite lack of reporting by the media, people with disabilities can be encouraged by recent and dramatic advancements in adult stem cell research, she said.

Adult cells may be more elastic than scientists previously thought and are offering short-cuts to treatment which embryonic cells cannot match. Over 70 medical conditions are either being treated using adult stem cell therapies or are presently in clinical trials.

“I am grateful for the principled stand our President has taken, first and foremost because of the sanctity of human life, but also because restrictions on use of taxpayer dollars may well encourage funding in the overlooked and less commercially viable field of adult stem cell therapy," Tada explained.

Tada's views contrast with those of Michael J. Fox, a well-known actor who suffers from Parkinson's disease.

Fox blasted Bush's veto claiming it went against public opinion, even though polls show a plurality of Americans oppose tax-funding of embryonic stem cell research.

"I find it frustrating that the president would use his first veto of his time in office to thwart this research," Fox said.

"I am respectful of those who oppose this research and their reasoning for it but they do represent a minority," he added.

Related web sites:
Joni and Friends International Disability Center - http://www.joniandfriends.org



TOPICS: Culture/Society; Extended News; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: bush; bushveto; disabled; embryonicstemcells; jonieareckson; joniearecksontada; moralabsolutes; paralysis; prolife; quadriplegic; stemcells; tada
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-58 next last
Comment #21 Removed by Moderator

To: marshallherman

Got a link to substantiate your comment?


22 posted on 07/22/2006 10:58:41 AM PDT by tutstar (Baptist ping list-freepmail to get on or off)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: marshallherman

There is absolutely NO LIMIT to embryonic stem cell research funding.


23 posted on 07/22/2006 10:58:59 AM PDT by wagglebee ("We are ready for the greatest achievements in the history of freedom." -- President Bush, 1/20/05)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

Comment #24 Removed by Moderator

To: marshallherman

Private organizations can spend all the money and destroy all the lives they want. But then again I'm sure YOU consider some leftist scientist at Harvard is an unbiased source.


25 posted on 07/22/2006 11:05:23 AM PDT by wagglebee ("We are ready for the greatest achievements in the history of freedom." -- President Bush, 1/20/05)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

Comment #26 Removed by Moderator

To: marshallherman

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1663376/posts


27 posted on 07/22/2006 11:12:50 AM PDT by wagglebee ("We are ready for the greatest achievements in the history of freedom." -- President Bush, 1/20/05)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: devane617
BS Joni...You DO NOT SPEAK FOR THE MAJORITY OF THE DISABLED COMMUNITY!!! I am part of that community, and overwhelmingly we are upset the President vetoed the bill. This is just plain BS. Go to newmobility.com forum for a view of how the disabled community feels.

She speaks for my wife {quad of 20 years} and for me as well disabled. But then again we do not support the ADA as applied to the private sector either. Adult stem cells are the obviously the most promising way to go. I also have two other family members life long confined to wheelchairs {30 plus years} and they support Joni :>}

28 posted on 07/22/2006 12:25:12 PM PDT by cva66snipe (If it was wrong for Clinton why do some support it for Bush? Party over nation destroys the nation.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: turnrightnow

I don't understand how people like MJF can think so much of themselves in this way that someone else's life's meaning is reduced to what it's sacrafice can do for ME, ONLY ME. Have to say though that I saw him on t.v. the other day when I watched that movie on CBS about Mort Kondracke and his deceased wife Millie. He looked really really bad and I almost didn't recognize him--couldn't believe my eyes


29 posted on 07/22/2006 12:33:33 PM PDT by SaintDismas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: wequalswinner

The whole argument boils down to one's view of and/or belief in God and the uniqueness of humans within creation. It's very easy (and logical) to have a utilitarian view of life if one believes that we are all no more than cosmic evolutionary accidents who therefore have no relative value compared with any other accident on the planet.
Killing many, no matter where they lie on life's continuum, for the benefit of a few (who will then eventually die of the next disease/illness) is immoral, no matter how you rationalize it.


30 posted on 07/22/2006 12:49:41 PM PDT by turnrightnow (bink's mom)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: tutstar

Got a link to substantiate your comment? >>>


they've been using bone marrow transplants (audlt stem cells) to treat and cure cancer patients for decades. I'm sure many yrs. of research went in to developing that process before they tried it out on humans.


31 posted on 07/22/2006 1:24:34 PM PDT by Coleus (I Support Research using the Ethical, Effective and Moral use of stem cells: non-embryonic "adult")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: 2ndMostConservativeBrdMember; afraidfortherepublic; Alas; al_c; american colleen; annalex; ...

God Bless her.


32 posted on 07/22/2006 1:25:08 PM PDT by Coleus (I Support Research using the Ethical, Effective and Moral use of stem cells: non-embryonic "adult")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marshallherman; lilylangtree
Diabetes has been cured in mice using drug therapy and it's just too bad the jdrf would rather advocate for fetal research killing babies rather than research for humans with something that has already been proven successfully in mice. Many pro-life people unknowingly donate to this organization .
 
Diabetes in Mice Cured Using Non-Embryonic Sources
 
Diabetes Foundation Loses its Way
 
Adult pancreas stem cells can make insulin
 
A Stem-Cell Defection, A congressman educates.

33 posted on 07/22/2006 1:41:30 PM PDT by Coleus (I Support Research using the Ethical, Effective and Moral use of stem cells: non-embryonic "adult")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: devane617

She speaks for my wheelchair bound best friend.

And we here at Free Republic don't believe in socialistic government spending for questionably ethical and questionably effective research.


34 posted on 07/22/2006 2:00:27 PM PDT by stands2reason (ANAGRAM for the day: Socialist twaddle == Tact is disallowed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

Comment #35 Removed by Moderator

To: turnrightnow

I disagree.

This has nothing to do with evolution, and a belief in God is not necessary to show humanity towards the unborn.


36 posted on 07/22/2006 2:04:37 PM PDT by stands2reason (ANAGRAM for the day: Socialist twaddle == Tact is disallowed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: marshallherman
No, I disagree.

I wouldn't use this treatment if I had AIDS for the same reason why Joni Eareckson Tada wouldn't use embryonic stem cells to treat her spinal cord injury as stated in this thread.

It's immoral and unethical for human embryos to be killed in order to use their cells to cure someone else with a disease. That's why President Bush vetoed the Embryonic Stem Cell Research Bill.
37 posted on 07/22/2006 2:07:26 PM PDT by Coleus (I Support Research using the Ethical, Effective and Moral use of stem cells: non-embryonic "adult")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Coleus

Thank you. I didn't know.


38 posted on 07/22/2006 2:57:42 PM PDT by lilylangtree
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee
"People like me -- who are medically fragile -- are left vulnerable and exposed in a society that views human life as a commodity which can be experimented upon or exploited," she explained.

Amen to that.

39 posted on 07/22/2006 3:00:03 PM PDT by jwalsh07
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cva66snipe

So, if we find embryonic stem cells helps people with SCI's then I encourage you and your wife both to not us the treatment. However, the vast majority of the disabled community will be lined up day one...


40 posted on 07/22/2006 5:43:58 PM PDT by devane617 (It's McCain and a Rat -- Now what?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-58 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson