"IMO, Kosovo belongs to Serbia, and always will, that should be the only plan on the table."
****I would love to argue, can't. Why? Because you are right. I am doing research this week for a journalist who will be putting out a piece of work answering the questions, Why is the U.S. involved? How did we get there? What are the goals? Why the Mafia can't be touched? et al......This goes back to 1948, CIA in Albania, then due to circumstances, communism influence (not to go in detail here....), there was a break of influence you might say, and finally in the late 80's CIA took their opportunity.....and a chain of events took place that "started" the Balkans wars.....notice I wrote "Started"....
I reported in most every security meeting, Peacekeeping forces and "conflict resolution" seminars for five f#&*g. years that "As far as I know, NO ONE has changed the 1244". Many would disagree at first, but someone would always back up common sense and agree..then, as always the discussion would fall short of anything more to say. This happened every time.....Notice the latest news...Asharri, and the UN "IMPOSING" independence? What happened to the K-Albanians going to vote for independence? I'll tell you what it's something called the "Resolution 1244". I also told them that Russia and or China would vote against radifying this UN Resolution, due to the close relationship between U.S. Administrators and Albanian Political leaders (mostly KLA and Mafia BTW). There is also several specific reasons why Ceku was "pardoned" for being a war criminal go figure. Deep Deep pockets pulled that one from INTERPOL...ya think? Another war coming......Macedonia and Southern Presevo is in the sights...with the final destination being the individual Republics of Russia.....
I ran into a good informative web site, for anyone that is interested should bookmark. The read is short, but thorough enough to grasp the evil intentions of Islam, and how they tacitly operate.
The relations of Muslims and non-Muslims were set in a context of a war: jihad. Its justification by Qur'anic verses and hadiths provides to jihad, the war against non-Muslims, a theological base. Jihad establishes a single pattern for relations between Muslims and non-Muslims and is central to their relationship. Jihad can be examined at three levels: its doctrine, its institutions, and its historical manifestations.
The ideology of jihad was conceived after Muhammad death. It encompasses a doctrine aiming at the Islamization of the world, supported by military institutions and tactics of war, all being considered as binding the Islamic community (umma). Jihad represents the Islamic worldview of war and peace, it constitutes a specialized domain of Islamic theology and law.
Jihad doctrine divides the peoples of the world into two irreconcilable groups: the dar al-Islam (the land of Islam) and the dar al-harb, (land of war) the non-Muslim world, destined to come under Islamic jurisdiction either by the peaceful conversion of its inhabitants, or by armed conflict. Jihad is the permanent state of war of the dar al-Islam against infidels until they submit to Islamic domination. Peace is accepted only temporarily according to circumstances. The institution of jihad regulates the conduct of war according to religious rules.