[Tokra]

You think that's strange, you should see the list of things that would have to have happened for evolutionism to be true.

I'd like to see your list.

Believing that the entire planet was covered with water that had to be at least 26,000 feet deep (it had to be deep enough to cover Mt. Everest, which is over 26,000 feet ABOVE sea level)is just a bit farfetched. Just where did all that water go when it "receded"?

[Sopater]

I'd like to see your list.

We could start with the origin of life through natural processes.

Better yet, we could start with the origin of the building blocks of life such as organic molecules with the proper chirality for life to even exist.

Or, what about the ability to add genetic information in such leaps and bounds that some functional attribute is actually acquired by a particular life form.

Or the question of sexual reproduction. There are some interesting fairy tales that are used to explain how that came about as well.

Anyway, this thread is not about the miracles of evolution. It's about critically examining evidence for a possible location of Noah's Ark. The evidence for a global flood, such as marine fossils on mountain tops, stratification of earth layers, rapid burial of various lifeforms found all around the globe (fossils), and even an abundance of water covering the majority of the earth's surface make the global flood of Noah more believable than any of the stories that have been told regarding the few issues listed above.