Skip to comments.
Dakota, 12, to star in 'disturbing paedophile film'
Posted on 07/21/2006 8:47:28 AM PDT by Akeirook
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 161-175 next last
Unbelievable.
1
posted on
07/21/2006 8:47:31 AM PDT
by
Akeirook
To: Akeirook
bad ju-ju for all involved...
2
posted on
07/21/2006 8:48:48 AM PDT
by
Hegemony Cricket
(Rugged individualists of the world, unite!)
To: Akeirook
She's a great actress. I wish she and her parents would reconsider.
3
posted on
07/21/2006 8:49:19 AM PDT
by
loreldan
(Without coffee I am nothing.)
To: Akeirook
Frankly I can't stand Dakota Fanning.
In War Of The Worlds she was at her insufferable best.
4
posted on
07/21/2006 8:49:19 AM PDT
by
angkor
To: Akeirook
Oops, sorry, missed posting the URL in the correct box. Don't see an edit button anywhere around here...
5
posted on
07/21/2006 8:49:29 AM PDT
by
Akeirook
To: Hegemony Cricket
6
posted on
07/21/2006 8:49:48 AM PDT
by
johnny7
(“And what's Fonzie like? Come on Yolanda... what's Fonzie like?!”)
To: Akeirook
Ugliness and perversity now constitute the cutting edge of "art." Up is down and square is round.
7
posted on
07/21/2006 8:50:10 AM PDT
by
Aquinasfan
(When you find "Sola Scriptura" in the Bible, let me know)
To: Akeirook
To: Akeirook
To prevent duplication, please do not alter the heading. Thanks.
To: Akeirook
So will the FBI arrest every studio employee involved in this movie, or will they wait for someone to download it off the internet and then send them to the pokey for 100 years?
10
posted on
07/21/2006 8:50:38 AM PDT
by
American_Centurion
(No, I don't trust the government to automatically do the right thing.)
To: Akeirook
Oh, in a few years, they'll have an 8-year-old have sex with an animal, and kill it afterwards.
Gotta keep pushing the envelope! And it's OK, because it's "art".
11
posted on
07/21/2006 8:50:53 AM PDT
by
ClearCase_guy
("He hits me, he cries, he runs to the court and sues me.")
To: Akeirook
To: Akeirook
The screenplay calls for Fanning's character to be raped in one explicit scene and to appear naked or clad only in "underpants" in several other horrifying moments. Maybe not anymore. I just posted this thread: Senate Goes After Hollywood Sex Scenes
13
posted on
07/21/2006 8:52:17 AM PDT
by
Drew68
To: Akeirook
Probably going to be directed by Roman Polanski.
14
posted on
07/21/2006 8:52:26 AM PDT
by
Thrusher
("...there is no peace without victory.")
To: Akeirook
Dakota is destined for the Betty Ford clinic. Thanks mom and dad. Any sane parent would say "Absolutely NOT!"
15
posted on
07/21/2006 8:53:10 AM PDT
by
Huck
(George Allen--the GOP version of Al Gore.)
To: Akeirook
This has got to be illegal.
To: GSWarrior
Glad to see someone else can't stand the kid! I've seen her on talk shows and she is over the edge. Tries to act very adult or is too adult-she has skipped childhool. She is already an overbearing Hollywierd type! I wouldn't think a parent would want their child to do such a film. How much money do these people need anyway!
17
posted on
07/21/2006 8:54:07 AM PDT
by
LYSandra
To: Drew68
Well, fwiw, if the XXX movie makers can keep up with the Section 2257 requirements then I can't imagine that the Hollywood studios will have any problem with them.
18
posted on
07/21/2006 8:54:13 AM PDT
by
AntiGuv
("..I do things for political expediency.." - Sen. John McCain on FOX News)
To: Akeirook
That's Entertainment!...
NOT!
19
posted on
07/21/2006 8:55:33 AM PDT
by
NormsRevenge
(Semper Fi ......The Ca GOP: Where conservatives votes count but their opinions don't.)
To: Akeirook
"Fanning's mother, Joy, and her Hollywood agent, Cindy Osbrink, see the movie, written and directed by Deborah Kampmeier, as a possible Oscar vehicle for the pint-size star."
Isn't this child abuse??? These so-called "adults" are exploiting this child for their own financial gain.
20
posted on
07/21/2006 8:56:28 AM PDT
by
Polyxene
(For where God built a church, there the Devil would also build a chapel - Martin Luther)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 161-175 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson