Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Spanish firm claims it can make oil from plankton
Reuters ^ | 07/20/06

Posted on 07/20/2006 11:09:05 AM PDT by presidio9

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-87 last
To: r9etb
The net energy collection would be on the order of 105 MWhrs per square kilometer.

Absorbing that much extra energy from the sun could contribute to global warming.

81 posted on 07/20/2006 1:30:15 PM PDT by TaxRelief (Wal-Mart: Keeping my family on-budget since 1993.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: TaxRelief
Absorbing that much extra energy from the sun could contribute to global warming.

For the most part it'd be absorbed anyway, by the water....

82 posted on 07/20/2006 1:44:55 PM PDT by r9etb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]

To: Flash Bazbeaux

***I think I saw something like this in a movie once, starring Charlton Heston and Edward G. Robinson.***

Soylent Green is people. Soylent Red is plankton.


83 posted on 07/20/2006 2:46:34 PM PDT by Ruy Dias de Bivar (Democrats have never found a fight they couldn't run from...Ann Coulter)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: r9etb

I guess. Your point about energy collection efficiency is well taken, btw. Do you think it's viable as a main method of energy production? Or would it just be supplementary, at best?

I mean...how much surface area can really be dedicated to something like this?


84 posted on 07/20/2006 3:11:10 PM PDT by Alexander Rubin (Octavius - You make my heart glad building thus, as if Rome is to be eternal.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: printhead
You put some but not all of it back. No problem.

Not all, because some remains as ash etc.

85 posted on 07/20/2006 3:42:18 PM PDT by JasonC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Alexander Rubin
Do you think it's viable as a main method of energy production? Or would it just be supplementary, at best?

Hard to say, without any idea of what their true yield is. It might well be a major source, which is about all you can really ask of any alternative.

I mean...how much surface area can really be dedicated to something like this?

The oceans are pretty big.... I think it's primarily a matter of access, rather than availability.

86 posted on 07/20/2006 7:45:56 PM PDT by r9etb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: presidio9

Starve the Whales! Feed an SUV!


87 posted on 07/20/2006 8:52:03 PM PDT by wildbill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-87 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson