[newgeezer]

That one of three cigarettes did NOT have his DNA, and two DID have his DNA somehow seems not to exonerate him at all, in my opinion.

Two of the butts had the victim's DNA. The third butt had the rapist's.

None had Briscoe's. He wasn't there.

[traditional1]

"Did I miss something in the article?

My mis-read. I got it. Thanks.