Posted on 07/20/2006 7:37:51 AM PDT by knighthawk
As fighting continues between Israel and Hezbollah, both the British government and the United Nations have called for the dispatch of an international peacekeeping mission to southern Lebanon. "The only way we are going to have a cessation of violence is if we have an international force deployed," British Prime Minister Tony Blair said on Monday. UN Secretary General Kofi Annan added that such a force is "essential." But with its long and troubled history in the region, the idea of sending a peacekeeping force should be dead on arrival.
In 1956, the United Nations deployed peacekeepers to separate the Israeli and Egyptian armies. At first the mission was successful. But in May 1967, Egyptian President Gamal Abdel Nasser sent 80,000 troops and 550 tanks to the Israeli border and demanded peacekeepers withdraw. They did. Less than three weeks later, the Six-Day War erupted. Peacekeepers unwilling to fight an aggressor and win cannot keep peace.
The UN tried again after the Yom Kippur War. In 1974, it sent a Disengagement Observer Force to separate the Israeli and Syrian armies. Butwhile the Golan Heights remained quiet, their mission was no success. Both Damascus and Jerusalem simply shifted the battleground to Lebanon.
After the 1982 Israeli invasion of Lebanon, the United States, France and Italy sent peacekeepers to Beirut to separate both Israeli and Syrian forces and Lebanon's many militias. All went well initially. But on April 18, 1983, terrorists attacked the U.S. Embassy in Beirut and, on October 23, 1983, a Hezbollah suicide truck bomber blew up the U.S. Marine barracks in Beirut, killing 241 servicemen. President Ronald Reagan promised to stand firm. "To remove them now," he said of the peacekeepers, "would undermine American credibility throughout the world." True, but he withdrew them anyway.
The Marines' departure from Beirut was a major defeat for peacekeeping. Not only would the Lebanese civil war continue for another six years, but terrorists also came to believe that the Western commitment to peacekeeping was ephemeral. In a 1998 interview, Osama Bin Laden called American soldiers "paper tigers," citing their withdrawal from Beirut as proof. That Annan yanked his staff from Iraq after the August 2003 bombing of the UN headquarters in Baghdad underscored Turtle Bay shared the same lack of resolve.
It is not only timidity that undercuts the UN's ability to keep peace, but also its susceptibility tocorruption. The July 12 kidnapping that sparked the latest violence was not Hezbollah's first. On Oct. 7, 2000, more than four months after Israel withdrew from Lebanon, Hezbollah guerillas using UN vehicles snatched three Israeli soldiers. After eight months of denying they witnessed the operation, UN peacekeepers in Lebanon acknowledged having a videotape, butbalked at sharing it with Israel. To do so, they argued, might "undermine UN neutrality." Hezbollah executed the prisoners. And Israel learned an important lesson about trusting peacekeepers.
There is one exception though to the peacekeeping curse. The Multinational Force and Observers have for 25 years kept peace in the Sinai. Their secret? They came not to end a war, but only after a peace treaty was agreed to. But as long as Hezbollah, Syria and Iran seek to wipe Israel off the map, peacekeeping will fail.
Rubin, a resident scholar at the American Enterprise Institute, is editor of the Middle East Quarterly.
There already IS a UN peacekeeping force in S. Lebanon - and Hezbollah started launching and continues.
What's the definition of insanity again?
The Israelis should go house to house, if that's what it takes.
Indeed, they have been there since the 70's. UNFIL, I believe is there somewhat descriptive sounding acronym. What was UNFIL doing while the hezzies bunkered the border?
1956 was a staged event. Nasser was going to seize and nationalize the Suez canal to fund the Aswan dam project. England and France didn't care for that idea much so they got Israel to stage an invasion so the UN could step in and secure peace, in reality to come in and secure the canal from Nasser. Ike was pretty ticked that he was left out of the loop on that one, guess he had more important matters with the cold war -> Soviet Union invading Hungary happened the same year.
First there has to be a peace to keep.
Absodadgumlutely right! I've been there and done the so-called "peacekeeping" in Lebanon. Like our Multinational Force in the early 1980s, UNIFIL has failed in Lebanon because it was sent too early to separate two parties still at war. UNFO has succeeded in Sinai because it separated two sides which had settled their differences on the battlefield -- after Israel routed Egypt's army and captured a large part of its territory. UNFO monitors a negotiated settlement between Israel and Egypt, neither of which has fired a shot at the other in decades.
You cannot be a "peacekeeper" until both sides are tired of fighting and there is a peace to keep. Now is the time for war, which will shape the conditions for negotiating a peace.
Peacekeepers? Get ready no woman, girl, goat or donkey will be safe.
UNFIL has no other role than that of observers, so I imagine they "observed."
Ping
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.