Let's see:
50 states, 5 elections per state since 1988, that's a total of 250 elections.
Out of that you cite some 30 elections, where a R followed a D. Wooppie! In other words, electing a Dem is really great and we should all vote for Angelides, because 12% of the time a Republican actually got elected after a Dem.
You must think everyone on FR is an idiot and will fall for your FALSE claims.
225, actually.
"Out of that you cite some 30 elections, where a R followed a D. Wooppie!"
No, I cited 32 instances in which a Conservative Republican (or one campaigning as one, in fact, you could add a couple more since Whitman and Weld claimed to be so in their races) won a race to beat or succeed a liberal 'Rat. I did not include other Republican victories where they succeeded another, nor RINO liberals succeeding 'Rats (or DINOs). It was a SPECIFIC question that you asked, period.
"In other words, electing a Dem is really great and we should all vote for Angelides, because 12% of the time a Republican actually got elected after a Dem."
I urge no vote for Angelides, NOR do I urge a vote for a liberal Republican. Your puny brain can't comprehend that. And, BTW, 32 instances is MORE than the "2" instances in which a RINO was followed by a Conservative. Were it the other way around, you'd never let us forget that fact. I'm not going to let YOU and the 'BOTS forget it.
"You must think everyone on FR is an idiot and will fall for your FALSE claims."
32 is more than 2. Read it and bite your pillow.