Skip to comments.
Tony Snow on Stem Cells
The Corner (NRO) ^
| 7/19/06
| Kathryn Jean Lopez
Posted on 07/19/2006 2:55:25 PM PDT by madprof98
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-34 next last
I'm glad Tony Snow is there to Speak the Truth to Power!
1
posted on
07/19/2006 2:55:27 PM PDT
by
madprof98
To: madprof98
Of all the times the President could have vetoed something, this is the one at the bottom of the list.
2
posted on
07/19/2006 2:59:51 PM PDT
by
DonaldC
To: madprof98
I'm witchoo. Tony just shuts these presstitutes down hard. It's a beautiful thing.
3
posted on
07/19/2006 3:01:26 PM PDT
by
karnage
To: madprof98
The inability of spokesmen for this administration to communicate a position clearly and intelligently has been a major problem since 2001. Finally they have someone in place who will not back down in the face of idiot badgering and who can also make an argument in a forceful, clear and intelligent manner. Better late than never I guess. But I sure wish they had put Snow or someone like him in place years ago.
4
posted on
07/19/2006 3:06:02 PM PDT
by
scory
To: DonaldC
Of all the times the President could have vetoed something, this is the one at the bottom of the list. While there are plenty of times he should have used his veto pen on bad legislation, there would have been hell to pay if he had signed this bill to use federal funds for embryonic stem cell research.
To: madprof98
MR. SNOW: You're just flat wrong. Just flat wrong. I mean, that is basically an attempt to substitute an insult for an argument.Man, I love this guy!!!
6
posted on
07/19/2006 3:06:29 PM PDT
by
Kenny Bunkport
(Israel is doing the Lord’s work.)
To: DonaldC
It's at the top of my list.
7
posted on
07/19/2006 3:07:01 PM PDT
by
TheDon
(The Democratic Party is the party of TREASON!)
To: madprof98
What's the point of having the snowflakes here today? What's the message of that? Hmmmm....did Tony just get handed a softball question?
8
posted on
07/19/2006 3:07:54 PM PDT
by
TheDon
(The Democratic Party is the party of TREASON!)
To: scory
9
posted on
07/19/2006 3:08:26 PM PDT
by
TheDon
(The Democratic Party is the party of TREASON!)
To: madprof98
Off topic, but after reading this I'm forced to wonder why the President kept that moron Scott McClellan around so long.
10
posted on
07/19/2006 3:08:45 PM PDT
by
Doohickey
(I am not unappeasable. YOU are just too easily appeased.)
To: DonaldC
Of all the times the President could have vetoed something, this is the one at the bottom of the list.
The stopping of waste of any federal dollars, no matter how small, is a great thing. Would rather have had him pull out the veto pen a lot earlier, but at least it was finally used.
I wonder if someday, somewhere along the line, if there will be a condition placed on federal funding. Say that the money is paid back if the technology develops a profit, or that if you take the federal money to develop something, you can't claim a patent for it. Oh, wait, that's 1960's thinking, isn't it?
11
posted on
07/19/2006 3:08:45 PM PDT
by
kingu
(Yeah, I'll vote in 2006, just as soon as a party comes along who listens.)
To: madprof98
some of the discussion out there that the President is holding back scientific progressBush resists quack-science, junk-science, the kind of "science" that the Demcrats promote as a means of attracting votes...you know, politically-motivated and agenda-driven pseudo-science.
12
posted on
07/19/2006 3:08:57 PM PDT
by
Kenny Bunkport
(Israel is doing the Lord’s work.)
To: DonaldC
maybe as far as you're concerned. This veto is one example of why I voted for him.
13
posted on
07/19/2006 3:09:37 PM PDT
by
Kenny Bunkport
(Israel is doing the Lord’s work.)
To: madprof98
And so the idea that the President is standing in the way of science seems to indicate that the only way you do it is through a federal grant. Lots of FReepers agree with this idea.
14
posted on
07/19/2006 3:09:58 PM PDT
by
TheDon
(The Democratic Party is the party of TREASON!)
To: madprof98; DonaldC; karnage
"You're just flat wrong. Just flat wrong. I mean, that is basically an attempt to substitute an insult for an argument. I've given you the argument and I've rebutted the insult." A thing of verbal beauty. I'm so glad Tony Snow is PS.
15
posted on
07/19/2006 3:11:17 PM PDT
by
Enterprise
(Let's not enforce laws that are already on the books, let's just write new laws we won't enforce.)
Q How do you MR. SNOW: You're just flat wrong. Just flat wrong. I mean, that is basically an attempt to substitute an insult for an argument. I've given you the argument and I've rebutted the insult.
Dang, that Snow is arrogant and rude.
I guess that happens with folks who talk for a living.
16
posted on
07/19/2006 3:11:53 PM PDT
by
humblegunner
(If you're gonna die, die with your boots on.)
To: DonaldC
Yeah? Valuing and protecting innocent human life is at the top of my list.
To: DonaldC
Good veto. Looks like Rove is aware there might be a conservative or two who voted for GW.
And, no, GW--this does not mean that you get to give amnesty to 12 million illegals.
18
posted on
07/19/2006 3:12:22 PM PDT
by
Mamzelle
To: TheDon
To: TheDon
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-34 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson