[originalbuckeye]

Sorry. You need to look further at ALL the studies. Many research studies have refuted the two that originally decreed that being gay was genetic. Some of the studies refuting the genetic link were done in Canada. Sadly, finding out there is not a gay gene doesn't fit the agenda of the MSM. Newspapers and networks have all ignored the numerous studies showing the lack of a gay gene because they don't want to upset their followers. Truth is less important than the progressive agenda in the PC world of the major news outlets.

[weegee]

The sex positive agenda doesn't care in the end if it is genetic or not. They are merely using the homosexual agenda as the battering ram to society's laws and morals.

Sex Positive teaching proponents want to end all moral judgements over sexual pairings regardless of age, sex, number, relation, marital status, or species of partner(s).

They realize that they must lie to get some people onboard "well, this is something they can't help, they were born that way".

Note that this is a radical shift from what we were told in Lawrence v. Texas: "This is consenting adults in private".

Well we certainly aren't talking about adults here and we aren't talking about anything happening in private, they want to send a boy with male hormones and genitalia into the girls' room.

Communists lie. Always.

[RBroadfoot]

How does one square a genetic cause for homosexuality with natural selection? I thought natural selection was the sine qua non of evolution?