Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: OB1kNOb

The Sampson Option is like MAD, Mutually Assured Destruction, except it would spread to include all of Israel's naughty neighbors, minus interestingly enough, Iraq. Specifically it has to do with the size of Israel and the fact that Israel cannot afford to lose a major city, especially Tel Aviv.If a major poluation center was in danger of being lost, Israel would strike with total force.

Recepients of Israel's wrath would include Iran and Syria. Egypt, Saudi Arabia, Pakistan are on the short list. France could be hit symbolically.

Sharon once said "Arabs may have the oil, but we have the matches."


219 posted on 07/19/2006 11:30:08 AM PDT by finnman69 (cum puella incedit minore medio corpore sub quo manifestu s globus, inflammare animos)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 206 | View Replies ]


To: finnman69

I appreciate the details. So if I understand, it more like a "if I'm going down to defeat, I'm taking all my enemies down with me"? I presume then that infers that if that point is ever reached, Israel fires every last thing that's nuclear in their arsenal to all points on their $*it list?


223 posted on 07/19/2006 1:06:37 PM PDT by OB1kNOb (This is no time for bleeding hearts, pacifists, and appeasers to prevail in free world opinion.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 219 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson