Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: BunnySlippers

"Veeerryy interesting. And all this time they have said the Koran does not allow for hurting the innocent."

The Koran doesn't allow the hurting of the innocent.

Now, define "innocent".

That's the problem with all these claims made in defense of Islam. We have a different definition of "innocent" than they do. The only possible "innocents" would be Muslims that the Muslims with guns consider Muslims (sectarian and racial differences). We infidels aren't innocent. We're the enemy. The very word for a person of the "Book" in Islamic law - dhimmi - means both "protected" and "guilty" - and that's only if they submit, pay protection, and admit that Muslims are better than them. None "People of the Book" aren't even granted that much.

Same thing with this "religion of peace" stuff. Define "peace". They define peace as "what happens after they win and kill or convert us all". "Islam is to dominate and not to be dominated", as their prophet said.


153 posted on 07/18/2006 9:11:22 PM PDT by Peisistratus (O xein angellein Lakedaimoniois hoti tede...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies ]


To: Peisistratus

Have you ever Googled "O xein angellein Lakedaimoniois hoti tede"?


157 posted on 07/18/2006 9:18:56 PM PDT by BunnySlippers (NUTS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 153 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson