Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: RS
I didn't mean to imply that the previous raised freeway was pretty. Actually, I'm all for making cities as human-friendly and beautiful as possible - just not in a $15 billion, shoddily constructed, corrupt, and mob-enhancing fashion.

As an amateur photographer I'm always interested to see in the half-invisible editorialization that takes place in the way you frame a subject. You have to admit that the whole rest of the city would look dirty if the "2005" photograph was taken on a smoggy day, right? And that would take away from the impact of the river. That's all I'm saying.

52 posted on 07/18/2006 4:48:50 PM PDT by Yossarian (Everyday, somewhere on the globe, somebody is pushing the frontier of stupidity.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies ]


To: Yossarian

Obviously, and the fumes from the cars coupled with the blocking of what breeze there was by the freeway would have made the local situation even worse. A simple matter like the highway stopping the rain from being able to wash away the dust beneath it would have had a great impact also.

I've walked one section before and after ... they did a great job.

BTW, as a photographer, you would love the fact that the bridges are all unique styles, many modern and one even using parts of an original bridge from the 1400's. The pathways below are ever changing, with "rapids", waterfalls and fountains - all lighted at night.


Google images for Cheonggyecheon


53 posted on 07/18/2006 5:49:17 PM PDT by RS ("I took the drugs because I liked them and I found excuses to take them, so I'm not weaseling.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson