Understanding the temper of the times--"two-state solution" was always a pipe dream

Jewish World Review ^ | 7-18-06 | Cal Thomas

[tomzz]

The idea of a "two-state solution" with a Palestinian state living alongside Israel was always a pipe dream concocted by secular Westerners. They accept a false doctrine that says the enemies of Israel (and America) can be placated by people they regard as "infidels."

Somebody else figures it out. Amazing.

There is one solution and one only to the "palestinian" problem; the slammite world has to be forced to find a place to put the fricking palis, and that place has to be far from Israel.

[Jack2006]

There are only five solutions then:

1. Kill every non-Israeli man, woman and child in the Gaza Strip and the West Bank.

2.Force out every non-Israeli man, woman and child in the Gaza Strip and the West Bank into Egypt, Syria and Lebanon.

3. Perpetual conflict.

4. The destruction of Israel.

5. The two state solution.

The USA will not support 1,2 or 4.

[Citizen Tom Paine]

Lest we forget, there are Palestinian Christians there whose ancestors have been Christian since Jesus walked the Earth. They really are in a pickle.

[Dark Skies]

Dr. Sookhdeo, a former Muslim, said, "in a decade, you will see parts of English cities which are controlled by Muslim clerics and which follow, not the common law, but aspects of Muslim sharia law."

This has already happened in Europe in the so-called "no go" areas in which the government authorities refuse to enter.

[Jack2006]

That is interesting, where are these areas?

[SJackson]

If you'd like to be on this middle east/political ping list, please FR mail me.

High Volume. Articles on Israel can also be found by clicking on the Topic or Keyword Israel.

also Keywords 2006israelwar or WOT [War on Terror]

----------------------------

[ksen]

There is one solution and one only to the "palestinian" problem; the slammite world has to be forced to find a place to put the fricking palis, and that place has to be far from Israel.

The trouble in the Mideast has nothing to do with the "Palestinians" not having a place to live. They are just pawns being used by the other Muslime countries to continue their push to destroy Israel and to keep attacking us.

NOTHING will satisfy them except the total destruction of Israel and the Islamization of the entire world.

[wai-ming]

It possibly began when the ancient Israelites drove out the Canaanites, Hittites, Hivites, Perizzites, Girgashites, Amorites and Jebusites. Modern Israel is attempting to drive out Hezbollah-ites, Hamas-ites, Islamic Jihad-ites and the rest.

Going into an area, taking over territory, and annihilating its inhabitants seemed to be a common practice among the returning Israelites in Biblical times.

It's interesting that that God of the Old Testament would support such a "scorched earth" policy. There must have been a good reason for it.

[Dark Skies]

That is interesting, where are these areas?

What is interesting is that you are unaware of this fact. Here is a link to The Belgian Journal in which Paul Belien regularly discusses this subject ...Ramadan Rioting in Europe's No-Go Areas.

Also, I refer you to Daniel Pipes, Ali Sina (of Faithfreedom.org), and Robert Spencer's Jihadwatch for period discussion of the growth of "no go" areas in Europe.

[Jack2006]

Terrible.

But the one thing I think US FReepers fail to realise is that the European governments are not following the European people on this matter.

All European peoples would vote to sort out the Muslims who cause trouble, but the governments are terrified of being un-PC.

[Dark Skies]

Yep. Welcome to FR BTW!

[JimRed]

The USA will not support 1,2 or 4.

Israel does not give a rat's @$$ about what the USA will or won't support. They have to do what they have to do.

[Jack2006]

Thanks! :)

[Jack2006]

I think they do care what the US thinks.

In any case Israel will not support 1 or 2 either. The proof is that they have the power to do both but they haven't.

[SJackson]

Unfortunately unitil new leadership emerges in the Arab world, #5 is the fulfillment of #1 to #4. Expressed clearly in the PLO's 1973 Phased Plan, official PLO policy, which calls for creation of a palestinian state solely as a base from which the Arab world will destroy Israel. Worth noting, the first priority on getting their "state" is reunification with Jordan, and I don't think peacefully is the idea.

[philetus]

There is one solution and one only to the "palestinian" problem; the slammite world has to be forced to find a place to put the fricking palis, and that place has to be far from Israel."

If you believe moving the palis away will end it, you don't get it either.

[photodawg]

There is one solution and one only to the "palestinian" problem; the slammite world has to be forced to find a place to put the fricking palis, and that place has to be far from Israel.


''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''

muslims have no place in the world for infidels except in a coffin or under their boot. The issue isn't the palestinians its islam.

[Piranha]

Most of the Palestinian arabs who live in the Gaza Strip are defined as "refugees" eligible for UNRWA help, under international law.

Since a refugee -- by definition -- is not living in his permanent home, this means that they are living in temporary quarters.

That being the case, there is no justification for settling them permanently in areas west of the Jordan River (e.g., in the West Bank or in Gaza). They should be settled permanently in Jorday, or Syria, or Egypt, or Lebanon, or in other Muslim areas.

As for the other non-Israeli citizens who live in the Gaza Strip and the West Bank, in my opinion they can be offered Israeli citizenship or retain their Jordanian or Egyptian citizenship. However, if they act in ways that are inconsistent with the peaceful existence of Israel, they should be deported to their own countries as enemies of the state.

Simple, really.

[Piranha]

It's interesting that that God of the Old Testament would support such a "scorched earth" policy. There must have been a good reason for it.

That's a brilliant comment. I never thought of it that way.