[Peach]

you did not say directly she was lying about that issue, but you made the point that you had not seen anyone say they had children involved in the rescue efforts. You made more than one reference in other posts that she had not answered your question or offered proof.

Tammy, you've made that claim 3 times now and been unable to back it up. Because it's demonstrably untrue.

As to her lying again, read carefully: It was that she could not back up her claim that I had condemned freepers to hell.

As to the rest of your mini rant, I'm starting to feel pretty sorry for you. I've answered those questions more times than you deserve. Or can understand, apparently.

[Tammy8]

you made the point that you had not seen anyone say they had children involved in the rescue efforts. You made more than one reference in other posts that she had not answered your question or offered proof..

Are you trying to say you did not do this?

[Tammy8]

#2. That freeper had every right to be frustrated with me. He/she said that freepers had family members involved with the extraction and it was upsetting to read Rebel's words. When I asked for a link and who was involved in the extraction (so I could thank them) none was given.

#3. That same freeper said I'd damned him/her to hell. When I asked for a link to that, he/she couldn't provide one. In other words, that freeper lied.

Peach, this is your post to me, in post number 1146. Please note I reposted it in post number 1353 so you would not have to go back pages to find it.

Please note in #2 of your post you said directly to me that the reason banned poster was frustrated with you was because of the post about freepers having family involved in the rescue. You also pointed out she could not give you a link that referenced what she was talking about. BTW I posted that link for you also in post number 1353, she may have been banned before she could find the link for you.

Please note in #3 of your post you said when she could not provide the link to the other issue "in other words she was lying." I took this to mean if someone can't provide a link to you when you ask for it, you take it that they are lying.

That is why I came to the conclusion that you said she was lying about the statement about freepers sending their sons and daughters to rescue US citizens in Lebanon. I was using your own explanation in post #3 of how you knew the banned poster was lying about the other issue.