Ok, well maybe your definition of harp is different than mine, I will rephrase- You brought up in several posts to others and to the banned poster that she had not answered that question. I note that in post 911 you said the banned poster was "lying again" so if you didn't mean she lied about people's children being part of the rescue- then when did she lie to you about the first time?
Those are of course not all your posts, or the banned poster's posts, as normally happens there were a lot of back and forth posts- all I was trying to show was that it did seem to me that the exchange started with her saying something to you about "ones sending sons and daughters" and progressed into the exchange where she thought you were condemning her and others to hell. I'm still not sure why she took it that way, but I still do think she was mistaken, not lying.
Tammy, Tammy, Tammy.
I don't know how many times I have to explain this to you.
#1. I never brought up the freeper families working on extraction to BykrBabs again.
Without going back and looking at my posts over 400 posts back, my recollection is that the issue came up from other posters who answered for her and brought it up to me, but I never brought it up again. Now, that's my recollection and you're free to try and prove me wrong, but you've been unsuccessful to date and you clearly went back and looked at a lot of posts and did a lot of work.
#2. As to my calling the suspended/banned freeper a liar -- the first time I called her a liar is when she said to me that I had condemned some freepers to hell.
That is untrue and it's demonstrably untrue.
#3. When freepers asked me what she lied about, I told them about #2 above. I don't believe I ever referenced the extraction by freeper families again. To anyone.
Now, you are free to go back 400 posts or more and look through all my posts. It's relatively easy (but boring) to do. But I don't believe I ever mentioned to anyone that BykrBabs was lying about the freeper's family/extraction issue.