Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: expatpat

ballistic, apparently, refers to the fact that the missile is not fired like a bottle rocket.

The ballistic missiles flight time, arc and trajectory have been calculated, and the missile is aimed for a specific target. The missile may or may not have onboard flight 'correction', or 'tracking', or 'targeting' abilities.

Just the fact it is 'aimed' based on known flight characteristics is enough to warrant the label 'ballistic'.


68 posted on 07/17/2006 1:08:14 PM PDT by UCANSEE2 (I will go down with this ship, and I won't put my hands up in surrender.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies ]


To: UCANSEE2
You miss the point of the argument (see post #23), in which the word 'ballistic' doesn't even arise. The issue has nothing to do whether it is ballistic or not, but is simply whether a rocket is a 'missile'.

Since you raise the issue, however, a missile is 'ballistic' if it is subject to no propulsive or direction-changing forces. For example, a golf-ball once it has left the club face or a bullet after it has left the barrel. A rocket is not ballistic before its propellant is exhausted, but then becomes ballistic.

75 posted on 07/17/2006 2:43:24 PM PDT by expatpat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson