Skip to comments.
Train bombers 'funded by British businessmen' (Global Jihad)
The Times ^
| July 17, 2006
| Daniel McGrory
Posted on 07/17/2006 8:07:18 AM PDT by sergey1973
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-58 last
To: Gengis Khan
How silly.
So it is official British policy to bomb India?
So it is Ireland's fault if the IRA bomb Britain? Of-course none of the hundreds of millions of Indian Muslims have ever harmed anyone. Be honest, admit that you hate Britain?
41
posted on
07/17/2006 11:08:49 AM PDT
by
Jack2006
To: Jack2006
"So it is official British policy to bomb India? "
You sound sooooo much like the Paki government except that they know they are lying, while you are blinded. It is your official British policy to harbor terrorists and allow jihadi recruitment for terror activities in India in a manner not very different from whats going on with those pigs across the border.
To: Gengis Khan
"So it is official British policy to bomb India? " You sound sooooo much like the Paki government except that they know they are lying, while you are blinded. It is your official British policy to harbor terrorists and allow jihadi recruitment for terror activities in India in a manner not very different from whats going on with those pigs across the border. So it is official British policy to harbour terrorists? Wow. I suppose history runs deep in certain places. I understand my friend.
43
posted on
07/17/2006 11:32:12 AM PDT
by
Jack2006
To: Jack2006
"So it is official British policy to harbour terrorists?"
Yes. Very much. The Brit government granted asylum to many Kashmiri and Sikh terrorists wanted in India. Also dont forget how Abu Hamza used to get doles from the British government. And of course dont forget how British government asked for safe passage of the British national Omar Shiekh involved in Indian Airlines hijacking and then killing of Daniel Perl.
And if you can manage to stop acting schizoid over history then maybe you see through the connivance of your own government.
To: Gengis Khan
Your hatred of the UK shines through my friend. Don't let the truth get in the way of that now.
45
posted on
07/17/2006 12:02:52 PM PDT
by
Jack2006
To: sergey1973
>The facts are that British lax laws allow numerous Muslim "charities" to operate on its territory and a number of Muslim "charities" do fund Terror groups
No, the tin foil thinks
that Britain is actively
involved in weird stuff:
-------------------------------------
"... We have often mentioned that things are not what they seem. The Iraq insurgents creating an unstable situation in Iraq are often British soldiers, who have been caught dressed as Arabs with bombs in their cars, arrested by the Iraqi police, and then sprung from jail by the Brits. Once incited, fingers point in all directions and the street fighting and retaliation is assured. The Berg beheading was not done by Arabs at all, as could be seen by a simple analysis of the dress and mannerisms of the executioners. ... "
To: Gone GF
start with Mecca and Medina
47
posted on
07/17/2006 2:53:31 PM PDT
by
Vaquero
("An armed society is a polite society" Robert A. Heinlein(the moon is a harsh mistress))
To: Gengis Khan
.......but Britain is an Islamic nation. Very soon the Union Jack will be replaced.
The answer to that, sir, is in the plural - and they bounce.
48
posted on
07/17/2006 4:32:03 PM PDT
by
Churchillspirit
(We are all foot soldiers in this War On Terror.)
To: Vaquero
"start with Mecca and Medina"
Which wipes out a small percentage of Muslims and kills many non-Muslims. What next?
49
posted on
07/17/2006 7:12:32 PM PDT
by
Gone GF
To: Jack2006
Your government has Indian blood in their hands and all you can do is squeal like a battered dog when your government is criticised. Great.
To: Gengis Khan
51
posted on
07/18/2006 3:30:54 AM PDT
by
Jack2006
To: Brit_Guy
"He's just an Egyptian Shopkeeper....." ROFLMAO!!!!Who just HAPPENS to own Harrod's now does'nt he?!!
52
posted on
07/18/2006 3:35:27 AM PDT
by
mo
To: Gone GF
what are the non muslims doing there..
while we are at it....deport all non-citizen middle easterners who are from hot spot countries....like Saudi Arabia, Egypt, Syria, Iraq, Iran, Afganistan, Pakistan. You know the drill.....
....its time for a crusade that WORKS for a change.
53
posted on
07/18/2006 3:52:15 AM PDT
by
Vaquero
("An armed society is a polite society" Robert A. Heinlein(the moon is a harsh mistress))
To: Eric in the Ozarks
You wrote: They hate the West. Why are they here ?
Well, some of them are here to destroy us.
54
posted on
07/18/2006 3:55:52 AM PDT
by
Former Proud Canadian
(How do I change my screen name after Harper's election?)
To: sergey1973
Interesting. Thanks for posting.
55
posted on
07/18/2006 4:10:41 AM PDT
by
PGalt
To: Vaquero
"what are the non muslims doing there.."
If you've invented a nuke that will kill just Muslims and won't poison the air or land where nearby non-Muslims live, you should be a rich man by now.
56
posted on
07/18/2006 6:14:27 AM PDT
by
Gone GF
To: Gone GF
Did FDR, Churchill and Ike hem and haw, wring their hands and torture themselves over the fate of Dresden, Hamburg, Hiroshima and Nagasaki because of the innocent victims????
We need to be like the so called 'Greatest Generation' and Sh*t or get off the pot.
57
posted on
07/18/2006 7:39:42 AM PDT
by
Vaquero
("An armed society is a polite society" Robert A. Heinlein(the moon is a harsh mistress))
To: Jack2006
lolol! kinda puts things into perspective!
58
posted on
07/18/2006 2:04:23 PM PDT
by
Mac1
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-58 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson