Skip to comments.
Gingrich says it's World War III
The Seattle Times ^
| July 17, 2006
| David Postman
Posted on 07/17/2006 4:45:59 AM PDT by PDR
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-27 last
To: PDR
Gingrich said he is "very worried" about Republicans facing fall elections and says the party must have the "nerve" to nationalize the elections and make the 2006 campaigns about a liberal Democratic agenda rather than about President Bush's record. Two words: GAY MARRIAGE
If you want Republicans to win, give support to Stonewall Democrats They will wreck Dems from inside!
21
posted on
07/17/2006 6:47:33 AM PDT
by
A. Pole
("Gay marriage" - Karl Rove's conspiracy to defeat Democrats?)
To: FunkyZero
no more, no less than any of the other candidates who are polling high
22
posted on
07/17/2006 7:16:15 AM PDT
by
PDR
To: PDR
If it's World War III, I suggest President Bush secure and enforce this nation's borders. Is that too much to ask?
23
posted on
07/17/2006 9:26:54 AM PDT
by
arnoldpalmerfan
(Tancredo for President 2008)
To: gondramB
re: I read it wrong the first time.
I do that all the time! Join the club!
To: butternut_squash_bisque
I agree, both that I like Newt and that his chances are pretty limited, but having said that, I hope he gives it a good run! His sense of history and his grasp of how the US fits, or should fit, into this world, would be very valuable. A lot of people need to hear him and his views. Then they can decide if they want to vote for him, but I sure do want to see him on the trail and in the debates!
To: jwparkerjr
>>re: I read it wrong the first time.
I do that all the time! Join the club!<<
What bugs me is when I read something the same wrong way two or three times and don't "get it" until somebody brings it to my attention.
26
posted on
07/17/2006 1:59:13 PM PDT
by
gondramB
(The options on the table have been there from the beginning. Withdraw and fail or commit and succeed)
To: gondramB
re: read something the same wrong way two or three times and don't "get it" until somebody brings it to my attention.
That's why it takes a very special person to be a proof reader. I used to work at the Tampa Tribune and I was always amazed at the copy editors who could spot a typo instantly when I had read and re-read something a dozen times just to avoid giving them the satisfaction of finding an error in my work.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-27 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson