They ARE cheaper than anything else, because the fuselage sections and the wing box and the wing structures are composite. The fuselage is laid up on a rotating mandrel and then cured in a huge oven (AUTOCLAVE) and emerging in ONE PIECE. This saves about a gazillion parts (and associated rivets) and therefore LOTS AND LOTS AND LOTS of LABOR.
I agree; composites are not 'CHEAP', but they are RELATIVELY cheap.
And they are proven.
Boeing and Airbus have been using composites for years. Notably, in Boeing-built military aircraft and control surfaces in transport ships. The BIG DEAL now is the fuselage, because it is a 'pressure vessel'.
And I'm crossing my fingers with everyone else that this works.
See this Mulally report from Farnborough for more inspiring news.
I agree composites are "relatively" cheap.
The fuselage development is on schedule.
Till the giant part gets dinged by a food truck, then what? They can't just replace a panel or a bracket or whatever.