Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: GSlob
I'd rather have titanium. Composites are not cheap, either.

They may not be cheap, but they require less labor to fabricate, and they don't require as much maintenance.

4 posted on 07/16/2006 8:07:51 PM PDT by Paleo Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


To: Paleo Conservative

I always thought the aircraft industry missed the bet by not going with cast iron ;^)


6 posted on 07/16/2006 8:09:39 PM PDT by investigateworld (Abortion stops a beating heart)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: Paleo Conservative

Titanium needs preciously little maintenance, does not corrode and is impervious to sunlight/UV caused degradation [this last one is a bane of most plastics except teflon].


9 posted on 07/16/2006 8:14:02 PM PDT by GSlob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: Paleo Conservative
"They may not be cheap, but they require less labor to fabricate..."

I Build airplanes using carbon fiber composites. How I wish that were true. Carbon is very labor intensive.
44 posted on 07/16/2006 9:06:41 PM PDT by Veloxherc (To go up pull back, to go down pull back all the way.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: Paleo Conservative
Ahead of the Farnborough Air Show, the US plane giant boss said "all future planes will be made out of composites", because it does not corrode.

Yes, but they do, delmaninate, crack and fail... And often do so catastrophically and without warning... such as that Airbus Composite Tail that snapped off in NY, killing all aboard.

64 posted on 07/17/2006 5:57:01 AM PDT by HamiltonJay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson