To: raccoonradio
The lawsuit also names the Consolidated Edison utility as a defendant, accusing it of failing to have proper safety devices.Dumb question, what safety device would prevent deliberate tampering? And if it is deliberate tampering, why would the utility be liable?
5 posted on
07/16/2006 3:20:23 PM PDT by
Fraxinus
To: Fraxinus
I'm curious also considering he physically opened the pipes up and rerouted them into the room. What do they really expect?
Their lawsuit against Con-Ed is just frivilous. Con-Ed ought to sue them back for harassment.
8 posted on
07/16/2006 3:24:34 PM PDT by
Bogey78O
(<thinking of new tagline>)
To: Fraxinus
Because ConEd has deep pockets.
12 posted on
07/16/2006 3:42:38 PM PDT by
quikdrw
(Life is tough....it's even tougher if you are stupid.)
To: Fraxinus
...."why would the utility be liable?"The question almost answers itself.
Because Con Ed has more money, doncha see.
To: Fraxinus
And if it is deliberate tampering, why would the utility be liable? They have money.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson