Replies

During the 2004 elections, that truly rare individual, a conservative gay gave me a heads about the Slimes, AP and most of the other liberal fishwraps. He said most of those writing the hit articles on GW has a long history of being gay or writing gay advocate pushing articles. He said that they wrote fiction which agreed with their wet dream fantasies instead of news, aka, Jayson Blair.

I would not be surprised to discover that a gay cabal has moved on journalism. They did the same thing in theater, which was already a closed shop in the 60's (you were gay-friendly, or you weren't in theater), and they'd been working their web in the Velvet Underground for years. Someone once described how Rock Hudson ad-libbed a bunch of gay pickup lines during his scenes with John Wayne while filming The Unconquered down in Mexico, back in the early 60's. When the film came back to Hollywood for editing, it had the gay writers and editors rolling on the floor. Wayne had no clue (being an honest man), he was baffled by Hudson's departures from script, and all the ad-libs went right over his head.

I noticed when the gay crusade began in earnest in 1994; it was keyed to the release of the pity-party film Philadelphia, which was actually written to be a gay agitprop piece (Jonathan Demme admitted it in a TIME interview). Philadelphia answered all the criteria laid down in After the Ball, in that it presented the gay man with AIDS as a pathetic, innocuous victim, and the straights as fanged, odious wretches with serious emotional issues of their own.

Both TIME and Newsweek jumped on the film, put it on their covers (I saved the relevant stories in a clippings file), wrote sympathetic reviews, and stuffed their issues with sidebar after sidebar of gay propaganda puff-pieces. It was an agitprop orgy, and seeing the newsmags jump out there like that, I began to wonder if they had fairly stout gay representation in their boardroom, their editorial conferences, and their writing staffs. From about that time, all the MSM slammed their tiltmeters over hard left on "gay rights" (I put it in quotes because the very concept is propaganda), and they have never, ever, seriously discussed those issues honestly again.

He told me to go to Yahoo search and enter the writer's name and add + gay or homosexual and hit enter. He said that I would be amazed at the results.

Hadn't thought of doing that, but thanks for the suggestion -- overt trolls would probably pop right out, now that you mention it. Thanks very much, and thanks to your amigo.

There are a couple of gays I would trust to discuss the issues honestly, and those are Camille Paglia and Tammy Bruce. Paglia often does lunch with Rush; she teaches art history in Philly. To be a fly on their tablecloth......

Tammy Bruce called it like it is in a book she wrote about the HRC and the rest of the gay fascists; she may be girl-crazy as a three-dollar bill, but somehow she's stayed honest enough to fly in the face of the "front politics" crowd that like to mob dissenters like Laura Schlessinger, Anita Bryant, Jerry Falwell, and all the leading ex-gay personalities like that Paulk fellow. (The gay cabal pulled identical stunts on both Falwell and Bob Dornan, btw, of planting a gay on his personal staff, who at the moment juste, came out to his utterly dumfounded boss. They also do the family-member thing: Chastity Bono (to bag trophy celeb Cher), Candace Gingrich and Mary Cheney (to embarrass and corner their relatives), and several others. It's lowlife, Iscariot stuff, but a favorite play in their book.)