Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Larry Lucido
It may have been because the judge disagreed with the verdict the jury returned and this was the judge's way to punish him a little instead of just letting him walk away scot free.
48 posted on 07/14/2006 11:04:25 PM PDT by FreedomCalls (It's the "Statue of Liberty," not the "Statue of Security.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies ]


To: FreedomCalls

I tried to google up more background on the case, but can't find anything except this story. It would be interesting to see what it was really about. While I generally respect jury verdicts, juries have been known to acquit a person against overwhelming evidence (O.J. Simpson) just because they didn't like the law/cops/judge etc. Of course, many folks have been bad-rapped by false witnesses and overzealous prosecutors on "child abuse" charges.

Be curious to know if the victim was actually abused by someone, or if this is just a case of a parent spanking a kid and being charged.


49 posted on 07/14/2006 11:16:52 PM PDT by Larry Lucido
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson