Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: edzo4

Why not blame the crazed lunitics who committed the deed and the scum who funded them?


18 posted on 07/14/2006 10:20:37 AM PDT by HEY4QDEMS (Sarchasm: The gulf between the author of sarcastic wit and the person who doesn't get it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]


To: HEY4QDEMS

lets not forget the addicts that worked on the big dig...


Southie rep wants methadone replaced by new treatment
By Dave Wedge
The Boston Herald
September 8, 2005 Thursday

A South Boston state representative fighting for better treatment for heroin and OxyContin addicts wants methadone phased out in favor
of the recently approved treatment drug Suboxone.

``Methadone scares the hell out of me,'' said Rep. Brian Wallace (D-South Boston), who sits on the Legislature's Committee on
Substance Abuse and Mental Health. ``They think it's going to help them get better and it doesn't. They become methadone junkies.''

Wallace said Suboxone, which can be prescribed by qualified doctors, is a ``cleaner,'' non-addictive drug with less potential for abuse.
The debate over methadone and Suboxone will be among the issues discussed next week when a congressional committee holds hearings
in Boston into the Bay State's OxyContin and heroin epidemic.

The Herald reported yesterday that many recovering addicts working on the Big Dig get methadone before work, including some who
drive trucks. While some studies question the drug's safety and effectiveness, methadone advocates claim it is not dangerous and is the
best treatment option.

``It's the gold standard,'' said Joycelyn Woods, president of the New York-based National Alliance of Methadone Advocates. ``It's the
only treatment for opiate addiction that really works.''

Woods said her group includes patients who work as window washers for the Empire State Building, as well as speedboat racers,
firefighters and doctors.

Kevin O'Donnell, president of Big Dig contractor M.L. McDonald, said he has had just two of 400 employees enter methadone
treatment, but neither has worked on the $14.6 billion project. None of his employees has failed Big Dig drug tests, he said.

Recovering addict and Teamster Devin Curry, who worked on the Big Dig, praised methadone for helping him get clean.

``I think it's a lot better these gentlemen are trying, every day, doing the right thing, rather than shooting dope like they were,'' Curry
said. ``All it does is stops the cravings and it helps them stay normal.''


19 posted on 07/14/2006 10:23:42 AM PDT by edzo4
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

To: HEY4QDEMS

lets not forget about the crooks that worked on the big dig




Arrests For Big Dig Concrete Fraud
FBI Says Company Sold Substandard Material For Boston Tunnel Project

BOSTON, May 4, 2006



(AP / CBS)


Fast Fact

Each man is charged with conspiracy to commit mail fraud; conspiracy to make false statements in a federal highway project; conspiracy to defraud the government and mail fraud.




(AP) Six men who worked for the Big Dig's largest concrete supplier were arrested Thursday on federal charges they falsified records to hide the poor quality of concrete delivered to the massive highway project.

The six, all current or former employees of Aggregate Industries, are named in a 135-count indictment on charges including making false statements, mail fraud and conspiracy to defraud the government between 1996 and August 2005.

The indictment charges the men with recycling concrete that was too old, and in some cases double-billing for the loads. The company was paid $105 million for 135,000 truckloads of concrete, and at least 5,000 of those truckloads did not meet specifications, according to the indictment.

The men were released on $100,000 unsecured bond each after making initial appearances in U.S. District Court in Boston.

According to the indictment, the faulty concrete was poured into walls and roof slabs in the Interstate 93 tunnel, parts of the Interstate 90 tunnel and the sea walls of the Fort Point Channel, among other places.


20 posted on 07/14/2006 10:28:12 AM PDT by edzo4
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

To: HEY4QDEMS

lets not forget about the drunks that worked on the bid dig



Hank Investigates: The big swig
Air Date: 11/21/2005

Reported by: Hank Phillippi Ryan


Video

mms://wm.world.mii-streaming.net/media/whdh/windowsmedia/features/1/051122_big_swig.wmv

(Windows Media)

Shocking, undercover video. Pictures those we caught on camera hoped no one would ever see. Investigative reporter Hank Phillippi Ryan found Big Dig workers out boozing on their lunch breaks and then returning to the job. Hank Investigates: The Big Swig.


It's a weekday lunchtime in Boston and in local bars, it's beers all around. This guy and this one and this one and more all having a liquid lunch.

We know they're on a noon break from their jobs. Who do they work for? You. And where they head next may put them and you in danger.

7News joined the lunch crowd with a hidden camera and let the camera roll.

Watch the man on the right in a baseball cap, the one with the beer. During his lunch hour we saw him drink three of them.

After a hour, we watched him walk out of the bar using the back door and within minutes he put on his orange union sweatshirt and yellow hard hat and was back on the job at Congress and New Chardon Street.

If you think, not good, but maybe just a one time thing.... here's a different lunch hour, same bar. Look at the guy on the end. Today "baseball hat man" is wearing overalls. It's the same person. This day we watched him down three beers in just an hour. Then wind up at the Big Dig's Cross and Fulton site.

Watch him. He looks a little shaky on his feet.

And what's next on his agenda? In his hard hat and orange t-shirt, he and a pal are back at work.

Who's the guy he's working with? You've seen him, he's the one sitting by baseball hat man at the bar, also with a beer, and later, he's the one who drove the two back to work.

We showed Big Dig officials they and their contractors have a problem.

Hank
"They drank beer after beer after beer. Is that possibly acceptable?"

Mariellen Burns/Central Artery Tunnel Project
"Absolutely not. Unacceptable."

In fact, the Dig's "Project Labor Agreement" signed by the Dig, contractors and unions specifically prohibits alcohol use.

Mariellen Burns/Central Artery Tunnel Project
"It's just not allowed. It's breaking every rule. Construction and alcohol just don't mix."

But back to the bar. Turns out baseball hat man has several drinking buddies. His luncheon friend on the left not only has three beers but a whiskey chaser. And no one has a bite of food. One last swig and he's outta there.

His destination Milk and Surface streets. He's got the key to the electrical box, and winds up hard hatted, behind the fence, and on the job.

Mariellen Burns/Central Artery Tunnel Project
"They're endangering themselves, they're endangering their coworkers, and they're endangering the public and we just wont have it on the project."

These two also drank on their lunch break. Here's another round. We saw them served three each in an hour. Again, no food was served.

An hour later they leave the bar, but they did not go to a Big Dig site. They work for the T. These lunchtime drinkers hop in an MBTA truck, at least they're not driving. We followed them to a Green Line stop.

They both put on safety vests and go right to work. One hauling, the other, look at his mask, ready to weld.

Hank
"Each of the people here had three beers and nothing to eat."

We showed the tape to Dan Grabauskas, the General Manager of the T.

Hank
"Do you need to see it again?"

Daniel Grabauskas/MBTA General Manager
"I don't."

Hank
"What do you think?"

Daniel Grabauskas/MBTA General Manager
"Well, it defies common sense to drink and be on a work site."

Grabauskas provided us the specific T rule alcohol consumption is prohibited 4 hours before reporting to work.

Daniel Grabauskas/MBTA General Manager
"It's dangerous. And we need to be held to a higher standard. We have people's lives in our hands and we shouldn't be having a beer in that same hand moments before you go to a worksite."

The Big Dig and the T didn't waste any time once we showed them the videotape. The MBTA fired the two workers who were drinking. They also fired their foreman for what the T calls, "failure to supervise employees." As for the Big Dig, they've banned these workers from doing any kind of work on their job sites.


22 posted on 07/14/2006 10:30:29 AM PDT by edzo4
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

To: HEY4QDEMS

and lets also not forget that just last week the democrats in the state were circling the wagons to keep the gravy train going....



Legislators set stage for a showdown
Vow to void Romney's Turnpike Authority pick
By Michael Levenson, Globe Staff | July 2, 2006

Legislators vowed yesterday to nullify Governor Mitt Romney's appointment of a loyalist to the board of the Massachusetts Turnpike Authority, setting the stage for a constitutional showdown over the control of the agency that oversees the Big Dig.

On Friday, Romney named Beth Lindstrom to replace Jordan Levy on the five-member board, a move that would shift in his favor the balance of power on the authority. But the Legislature passed a bill that would extend Levy's term, keeping control of the authority out of Romney's hands.

Romney's spokesman, Eric Fehrnstrom, yesterday called that move illegal and said the governor would veto the measure.

Legislators said yesterday that they planned to override the governor's veto, extending Levy's term on the board and nullifying Lindstrom's appointment.

``That appointment may be short-lived," Representative Joseph F. Wagner, House chairman of the Transportation Committee, said of Lindstrom's installation. Speaking of the measure to extend Levy's term, he said, ``It's very clear that if enacted into law, that provision would supersede any appointment by the governor."

The standoff is the latest escalation in a bitter three-year struggle for control over the authority, a battle that has centered on the management of the Big Dig by the board's chairman, Matthew J. Amorello .

If Levy, a frequent Romney critic, regains his seat on the board, Amorello will retain control of the authority and its supervision of the $14.6 billion project to remake Boston's downtown transportation network. If Lindstrom prevails, Romney, who has tried repeatedly to remove Amorello, will have the support of the majority of board members for the first time since his election to governor in 2002.

The clash erupted Friday, the day Levy's term on the board officially expired. Working quietly, the House and Senate included in its $25.7 billion annual budget a bill to extend Levy's term until January, after Romney leaves office. That same day, Romney issued a letter appointing Lindstrom, his former consumer affairs chief, to Levy's seat on the board.

State law grants the governor the authority to name board members, and the Legislature cannot exert its will by tinkering with the expiration dates of board members' terms, Fehrnstrom said.

``Our view is that it is unconstitutional," Fehrnstrom said. ``It's an illegal usurpation of the governor's appointment powers . . . You can't extend the term of a member who is no longer on the board; this would be a usurpation of the governor's powers."

Asked his opinion, Herbert P. Wilkins, a retired chief justice of the Supreme Judicial Court, said the Legislature may have the upper hand.

``I generally think legislation would prevail in this kind of situation, but I don't know enough about the Turnpike Authority statute to say that with confidence," Wilkins said yesterday. ``There are obviously bond-holders who might care about the statute being changed. It's pure politics. . . . it's a complicated interrelationship."

Patrick J. King , a retired Superior Court judge, said that if the Legislature goes through with its plan to nullify Lindstrom's appointment, the case would probably end up in court.

``I haven't a clue as to whether they can do that or not," King said of the Legislature's plans. ``But it's an interesting case."

Wagner said he expected that lawmakers would be able to muster the two-thirds' vote needed to override Romney's veto. Amorello, a former Republican state senator, still has many allies in the Legislature, including Senate President Robert E. Travaglini.

And Levy, an Amorello ally and former Democratic mayor of Worcester, said he expected that the veto would be overridden and he would continue serving on the board.

``The governor is trying to destroy the very fabric of this authority, and that concerns me," Levy said yesterday.

``So, as far as I'm concerned, the Legislature has asked me to serve, by virtue of this bill. I'm honored by that support, and I intend to," he said.

But Fehrnstrom said the Legislature created a problem by overstepping its authority. He said that only the governor can name members of an independent authority.

``The fact is that the clock has run out and Beth Lindstrom is the new member, and that makes this provision null and void," Fehrnstrom said.

Both sides said they have the best interests of the public in mind.

``The governor's objective and the objective of his appointees is to bring transparency, disclosure, reform, and efficiency to the operations of the Turnpike Authority," Fehrnstrom said.


23 posted on 07/14/2006 10:33:28 AM PDT by edzo4
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson