Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ForGod'sSake

Their excuse may turn out to be that money need not be appropriated for something that possibly can't be built anyway......

Senate Bill 2611
"Federal, state and local representatives in the United States shall consult with their counterparts in Mexico concerning the construction of additional fencing and related border security structures before the commencement of any such construction."

Personally, I think it may be more than that. I believe that in order to get around the House Bill, the Senate/Bush are going to suddenly be willing to compromise and enforce borders first. However, what may be hidden in their proposal, according to Tancredo, are 'triggers', whereby a lot of what they proposed originally will be triggered as soon as the administration 'deems' the border to be 'secured'.


80 posted on 07/14/2006 9:27:40 AM PDT by Kimberly GG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies ]


To: Kimberly GG
Truth be known, I think there's some major election year politicking going on. The machinations these people go through leave most of the unwashed completely in the dark. Intentional? 'Spect so. The question I've had all along is, what's wrong with the immigration law(s) we have now? They(the Bush administration?) haven't lifted a finger to enforce them, why should we believe they will enforce any new immigration law(s)? Election year smoke and mirrors IMHO.

I can just about guarantee you there's more to their tacit approval of this illegal invasion than meets the eye. But, what is it???

FGS

108 posted on 07/14/2006 1:00:15 PM PDT by ForGod'sSake (ABCNNBCBS: An enemy at the gates is less formidable, for he is known and carries his banner openly.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson