Skip to comments.
Target threatens to leave city (Chicago) if 'big-box' wage rule passes
Chicago Sun-Times ^
| July 14, 2006
| FRAN SPIELMAN City Hall Reporter
Posted on 07/14/2006 4:02:49 AM PDT by Chi-townChief
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 201-202 next last
WOW - 'good' Target is going the same route as bad old WalMart. This should piss off a few lefties.
To: Chi-townChief
So only the "big" stores have to abide by this law. So every other business in the area better not become too successful or else.
To: Chi-townChief
For once I'm proud of something "French", showing some brass ones.
To: Chi-townChief
Maybe the spread of HIV/AIDS after the Gay Games will occupy the time of the alderman who don't like guns, cigarettes, trans fats, or foie gras.
I hope Target and all the big boxes come out to Will County (heavy Republican) where growth is spectacular.
To: Chi-townChief
"Chicago...." "big-box...." "wage rule...." the race of the alderman was specified (why is that newsworthy if color isn't supposed to matter?) --- all the buzzwords of a fat, lazy, dog-days shakedown.
To: AbsoluteJustice; Augie76; Barnacle; BeAllYouCanBe; BillyBoy; Bismarck; bourbon; cfrels; ...
To: Chi-townChief
The minimum wage is going to be at $7.25 everywhere in short order anyway. I don't think they are actually going to leave. They'll threaten. But there is no where to run.
It really doesn't make sense to leave even if the minimum does not go up everywhere else. You just raise your prices to cover it, and you give that as your reason.
7
posted on
07/14/2006 4:11:08 AM PDT
by
Brilliant
To: Chi-townChief
"Ald. Joe Moore (49th), chief sponsor of the big-box ordinance, accused Target and Wal-Mart of using "bullying tactics" to stop a train that has already left the station."
Gotta love the way the libs insist that they have the right to demand that Target and Walmart build in their area, all the while giving up any rights to make their own decisions in regards to running the store. As far as I can see, if a person doesn't want to work for $8 an hour, they simply don't apply for the job. Raising the wages would only result in higher product cost - that way everyone gets to move backward.
8
posted on
07/14/2006 4:11:22 AM PDT
by
onevoter
To: AmericaUnited
For once I'm proud of something "French", showing some brass ones. Target is not French-owned. That's an urban legend.
9
posted on
07/14/2006 4:11:48 AM PDT
by
Egon
(We are number one! All others are number two... or lower.)
To: Chi-townChief
Our largest employer in the 34th Ward is the Police Department. Maybe they should open another Bix Box Police Department.
The city is lucky that ANY business wants to open in this district.
To: Chi-townChief
WOW - 'good' Target is going the same route as bad old WalMart. This should piss off a few lefties.
And a few Freepers.
11
posted on
07/14/2006 4:15:32 AM PDT
by
John D
To: Brilliant
The minimum wage is going to be at $7.25 everywhere in short order anyway. But the city is also demanding another $3 in benefits for every employee.
Plus, these stores will have higher insurance, higher rates of theft and vandalism, and higher employee turnover.
Something will have to give. There's not that big of a margin.
To: Brilliant
"But there is no where to run."
Will and Kendall counties are waiting...
To: Chi-townChief
What makes this story so delicious is that so many lefties seem to worship Target as the anti-Walmart. I have long wondered why some embattled larger corporation did not exercise a boycot of their own and simply refuse to do business in states or cities where they are harassed. Can you imagine if one (or better yet all) of the tobacco comapnies just decided they would no longer sell their legal products in a state? Tax revenues would plummet and government officials would be demanding the resumption of sales.
14
posted on
07/14/2006 4:19:40 AM PDT
by
rhombus
To: Chi-townChief
The saber-rattling is intensifying as the clock winds down toward a July 26 showdown vote on plans to make Chicago the nation's first major city to establish a "living wage" for stores with at least 90,000 square feet of space operated by retailers with $1 billion in sales.So build 89,999 SF stores with the design ability to shed SF, based on changing standards....
15
posted on
07/14/2006 4:21:02 AM PDT
by
cbkaty
(I may not always post...but I am always here......)
To: Chi-townChief
I love the idea of running a shuttle bus from Chicago to the Walmart in the suburbs.!!!
I figure it would take a few months for the liberals to find a law squashing that..but it would be great to see....they could make a point to drive by city hall and maybe have a counter on the bus to show how many shoppers they pull from the city everyday!!!
To: Egon; AmericaUnited
17
posted on
07/14/2006 4:22:39 AM PDT
by
dmw
(Aren't you glad you use common sense, don't you wish everybody did?)
To: Chi-townChief
"Wal-Mart and Target could pay their people a living wage. Then we wouldn't have this problem, and people could actually live on the money they made," Hairston said.Well, geez, Ms. Hairston, you seem to know so much about how to run a Walmart or Target store, why don't you just step in and take over as CEO?
Typical liberal the state should run everything mindset.
To: onevoter
"Ald. Howard Brookins (21st) is still searching for a big-box retailer to replace the Wal-Mart his colleagues nixed at 83rd and Stewart."
This WalMart ended up at 95th & Western with hundreds of employees, thousands of happy customers, and of course, millions of tax dollars for Evergreen Park instead of Chicago.
Protesters bash Wal-Mart's attempt to open 2 stores in Chicago
To: Egon; dmw
Wow! I never knew that. The French story is just so pervasive. I looked at Target's "About Us" and just read that they are the old Dayton-Hudson and Marshall Fields.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 201-202 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson