Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Steve Van Doorn

I mean, one of the most absurd parts of their whole report is the fact that one of the fuel tanks was empty, or almost empty. On an International flight, that is simply not going to be the case. That in and of itself rings loud and alarming bells for me.


19 posted on 07/13/2006 3:47:50 PM PDT by phoenix0468 (http://www.mylocalforum.com -- Go Speak Your Mind.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]


To: phoenix0468

I do not believe the fuel tank thing for one second.People better be careful they do not get too close to the truth.


21 posted on 07/13/2006 3:51:00 PM PDT by xarmydog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

To: phoenix0468

"On an International flight, that is simply not going to be the case. "

Yes, it is. Common thing on 747's.


24 posted on 07/13/2006 4:58:31 PM PDT by UCANSEE2 (I will go down with this ship, and I won't put my hands up in surrender.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

To: phoenix0468
I mean, one of the most absurd parts of their whole report is the fact that one of the fuel tanks was empty, or almost empty. On an International flight, that is simply not going to be the case

That's not uncommon at all. The range of a fully fueled 747-131 like TWA 800 was about 9500 kilometers. The distance between New York and Paris is less than 6000 kilometers. It makes no sense for an airline to buy fuel it isn't going to need just to haul it around in an airplane.

29 posted on 07/13/2006 5:35:51 PM PDT by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson