[xzins]

You belie your handle.

In any case, to get evolution you need a transition to another kind.

That would be bird to mammal; fish to reptile; mammal to X.

But, you missed the humor. Rocky the flying moonbat.

Or would that be Batman VI?

[Dimensio]

In any case, to get evolution you need a transition to another kind.

"Kind" is not a recognized biological classification.

That would be bird to mammal; fish to reptile; mammal to X.

You are attempting to re-define evolution. That is not an honest method of discussing the subject.

[whattajoke]

to get evolution you need a transition to another kind. That would be bird to mammal; fish to reptile; mammal to X.

Please provide the definition of "kind." And after that, please explain the Tiktaalik, a very recent fossil find that evolutionary scientist PREDICTED would exist and nailed exactly where. After that, please provide the last creationist find. Thank you.

[b_sharp]

"n any case, to get evolution you need a transition to another kind.

"That would be bird to mammal; fish to reptile; mammal to X.

So you admit that adaptation is powerful enough to produce Bears, Dogs and Weasels from a common ancestor?

Or even further back, that adaptation is powerful enough to produce all Feliformia and Caniformia from a common ancestor?

Or would you like to rethink that definition of Evolution?