Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Reactionary
I was suspicious of several crashes going back to the 80s. Just my personal conspiracy theory, I don't claim to be an expert. But this was just too obvious.

That one over Queens was pretty fishy too.
14 posted on 07/13/2006 9:45:50 AM PDT by AlexandriaDuke (Conservatives want freedom. Republicans want power.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]


To: AlexandriaDuke
That one over Queens was pretty fishy too.

Don't confuse the issue by putting both in the same theory.

They found the vertical tail in the water behind where the aircraft had flown.

An aircraft cannot be flown with no yaw control. They roll over into a spin and parts start coming off.

The verticle tail is of composit on that aircraft, and it cannot take the stress that was put on it by the pilot.

It broke off.

33 posted on 07/13/2006 12:24:49 PM PDT by Dan(9698)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

To: AlexandriaDuke

I have to wonder what we would have been told happened if the Shoe Bomber had been successful.

His attempt is still not listed often among TERRORIST ATTACKS since 9-11. Just becuase he was unsuccessful does not mean the attack didn't happen. He was stopped IN THE ACT.


35 posted on 07/13/2006 1:06:01 PM PDT by weegee (Seasons greetings and happy holidays this June-July!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson