Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Dead Corpse
Which was over turned by Nunn V State as unConstitutional by reason it violated the Second Amendment.

No, you have it backwards. The Nunn decision explicitly upheld bans on concealable weapons.

296 posted on 07/30/2006 7:17:54 AM PDT by Mojave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 294 | View Replies ]


To: Mojave
The Nunn decision explicitly upheld bans on concealable weapons.

But over turned the law as there was no provision for open carry. Can't have both as they violate RKBA. Bans on CC are fine as they fall under "regulation". But then you can't ban open carry.

Nor can the imposition of a number of fines to exercise a Right be considered legal either. Any number of poll taxes, preventing certain peoples from voting, have been shot down numerous times.

301 posted on 07/30/2006 7:20:58 AM PDT by Dead Corpse (It is not the oath that makes us believe the man, but the man the oath.- Aeschylus)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 296 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson