Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: madprof98
The sanctimonious speechifying is absolutely breathtaking in it's self-deluding absurdity.

She killed her baby because she had Down's? What a positively frightful and twisted mother this herrian would have been, nevertheless the baby deserved better than murder.
7 posted on 07/12/2006 1:07:53 PM PDT by Skooz (Chastity prays for me, piety sings...Modesty hides my thighs in her wings...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Skooz
"But if you don't want to keep a seriously flawed baby"

The parents are the ones who are seriously flawed.
12 posted on 07/12/2006 1:10:35 PM PDT by NewCenturions
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: Skooz

My wife and I would dearly love to adopt another child. We have several friends and some family that have Downs kids. Despite their learning disabilities, they are without exception the nicest, sweetest kids I have ever seen. It just burns me up when I see this wanton destruction of another innocent human life.


23 posted on 07/12/2006 1:19:43 PM PDT by P8riot ("You can get more with a kind word and a gun than you can with a kind word alone." - Al Capone)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: Skooz

Downs is no walk in the park.


28 posted on 07/12/2006 1:24:39 PM PDT by Windsong (Jesus Saves, but Buddha makes incremental backups)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: Skooz

Her fetus was not affected with Down Syndrome, it was triple-X. And while I don't object as you do to parents choosing to abort for Downs, which inevitably results in significant mental retardation and life-shortening physical defects, triple-X females have no physical problems (just tend to be on the tall and slender side, but that's hardly a defect) and usually have low-normal intelligence (i.e. they are not retarded). They mature normally and are fertile, and unless they've been tested for chromosomal abnormalities, usually nobody knows they have one -- they're just tall and slim and not particularly smart. In other words, they have no characteristics which couldn't just as well appear in a chromosomally normal female. So it's pretty hard to grasp what this couple's reasoning process was. If it was that essential to them to have a baby that was as perfect as possible under current technology, why they heck didn't they do IVF with preimplantation genetic diagnosis?


83 posted on 07/12/2006 3:09:54 PM PDT by GovernmentShrinker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson