Posted on 07/12/2006 12:17:25 AM PDT by indianrightwinger
No: the message, continues to be people who believe they can use violence, and can kill anyone for the heck of it, or kill them because they are not 'religious' enough.
Except the looney Arundhati Roy, nobody may cry a tear!
poor Arundhati , so pretty yet so misguided.....
Or you are the wrong religion or the wrong sect of the right religion.
Or you have friends that are the wrong religion or you do not observe the obscure tribal practices that through the centuries have come to be associated with religious piety.
Or you have too much modern technology in your home
Or you sell foreign foods in your restaurant.
Or you watch foreign sports on TV.
When you make your self the judge and jury of piety there is not much that can escape you notice that deserves the death penalty.
hehehehehehehehehe.....
Yes, just like the millions of elitist liberals in this country. :-)
I think the terrorists, pals of AQ, misunderestimate the will of the People of India. Retribution for these acts of violence are and will awaken the will of fence sitters all around the world. It was a stupid move by the terrorists, one which they will regret fiercely while they rot in Hell.
Wait till the hear our reply.
The Muslims have been terrorizing the Indians for decades. It has nothing to do with the US.
If you don't want to get too close to the US, don't take our money and don't ask us for anything.
At some point, which I believe is long past, we need to go after the Muslim countries that support terrorists. Iran, Pakistan and Saudi Arabia top the list. The President ought to give these countries an ultimatum, stop terrorism or your government will be attacked. Iran is sending operatives and IEDs into Iraq to kill Americans, Iraqis and de-stabilize the situation. This is an act of war. If they want war, give them a taste of war. Pakistan is doing the same in Afghanistan. Tell Musharef and his ISI that the ISI will be attacked unless they stop support for the Taliban and hand over Bin Laden. Tell Saudi, stop your funding of Wahabbism around the world or we'll come in and split your country and turn the oil producing part of it over to the Shia, who live in that area. I think the Shia will become US allies for their own protection.
Bush ought to have been supporting regime-change in Iran since the Iraq invasion. I don't know if he's taking the war on terror seriously. He sure doesn't seem like it.
I can't help but wonder if the Mumbai bombing on 7/11 had anything to do with Joe Biden's comments about Indians working at 7-11. I'm staying away from Dunkin' Donuts just in case.
That is pretty ironic!
How dare you mention muslimes!!!!!
Listen to the MSM!!
It was freedom fighters.
It was youths.
It was Pakis.
It is NEVER muslims!
Just read that Hebollah kidnapped some more Israelies. Now the IDF is in S. Lebanon, Syria will be next. The Third world war is at our doorsteps. This time its Asia. I see 3 fronts. Israel and the Middle East, North Korea, China vs Japan and The USA, India vs Pakistan. I wonder how all this will play out in the coming weeks/months.
Wish I had more time to dissect your post, but I will start here:
Our response involves far more than instant retaliation and isolated strikes. Americans should not expect one battle, but a lengthy campaign, unlike any other we have ever seen. It may include dramatic strikes, visible on TV, and covert operations, secret even in success. We will starve terrorists of funding, turn them one against another, drive them from place to place, until there is no refuge or no rest. And we will pursue nations that provide aid or safe haven to terrorism. Every nation, in every region, now has a decision to make. Either you are with us, or you are with the terrorists. (Applause.)
From this day forward, any nation that continues to harbor or support terrorism will be regarded by the United States as a hostile regime.
President George W. Bush, 9-20-01
Ummmmmmmm,
AFGHANISTAN?.....IRAQ?
Unrelated pet peeve. The Indians have not changed the name of their city. Why is it that English translators are using a different spelling for Bombay?
It gets on my nerves that historically set names are changed willy-nilly by contemporary journalists
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.