Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: xzins

I believe you are correct, the one investigative officer is usually a military judge who forwards his results to the courts-martial convening officer. Although, I do not have any personal experience with the Article 32 process.


5 posted on 07/11/2006 6:40:23 PM PDT by ops33 (Retired USAF Senior Master Sergeant)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]


To: ops33

The one big advantage for the accused in an Art 32 is that they can get into the prosecutions stuff before the actual trial.....discover, data, witnesses, etc.

If there's not much of a case, then the Art 32 is duty bound to report that to higher.

If it goes forward to a court martial, that normally means the evidence is almost certainly going to be difficult for the accused.


6 posted on 07/11/2006 6:51:30 PM PDT by xzins (Retired Army Chaplain and Proud of It. Supporting our Troops Means Praying for them to Win!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson