Traynor's words in the 1948 Perez decision were cited repeatedly Monday as the District Court of Appeal in San Francisco heard oral arguments on the twin cases. Lawyers for San Francisco and gay rights groups argued that Proposition 22 is as inherently violative of personal liberty as the anti-intermarriage statute.
For any interested:
California Appellate Court First District: Same Sex Marriage (part 1)
[Size: 176 MB, Duration: 2:06:46]
mms://63.201.172.140/tcc_on_demand/0710A.wmv
California Appellate Court First District: Same Sex Marriage (part 2)
[Size: 138 MB, Duration: 1:39:30]
mms://63.201.172.140/tcc_on_demand/0710B.wmv
Homosexual "marriage" and bi-racial marriage can be compared when we start finding former black people, former white people and former Asians.
Until that time, no grounds for comparison.
(And the obvious fact that race is benign and neutral and homosexuality is neither benign nor neutral, plus it's defined solely by actions.)
I'm really getting disgusted at comparing those who practice same sex acts with people of particular racial groups. It's damn insulting!