I'm not sure ctdonath2 was questioning your veracity but somehow thought you couldn't figure out what you were really looking at. Either way I can see how you'd think ctdonath2 was a little insensitive at best and a little insulting at worst.
Oh well. It's 7:38 so time for another carafe of wine, right???
Having examined many "photoshopped" pictures (and those not but accused thereof), I was simply making the relevant suggestion of looking a little deeper at the images before jumping to the "conspiracy" line of reasoning.