[Eagles6]

There is no fallacy in my arguement. Please read gandalftb's post #20. Sheds light. The terrorists did not mention rape, murder or revenge until the first story raising the theory was published in the LA Times last week. The alleged incident was never mentioned by the jihadis in the months since it happened. Don't you think that the "justice" done to the Crusaders would have been proclaimed in all the jihadi sites if that had been true? It wasn't because that wasn't why they had been taken, alive or dead. This is a way to use the msm to garner support for the terrorist cause and the media is only too happy to comply.

[CobaltBlue]

Sorry, but you're mistaken, as a tiny bit of effort would reveal to you.

The first person to say they thought it was revenge was the man who confessed to the incident. Not the media, not the persons who killed the Americans, not anybody taking credit for the act. One of the men who was there.