[Secret Agent Man]

Again, you confuse a legitimate use of surveillance on a minor child by his parents (legally responsible for that child, and also the owner of the vehicle) to one where the state uses to abuse and oppress the vast majority of society. They aren't the same. You need to understand the difference.

If this would have been an article of teens run amok because parents can't control them and don't know what their kids are up to, many of you against this would be calling for child monitoring and sterilization of the parents. I've seen it in other posts here on deadbeat parents. If you're a parent and disconnected from your kid, you suck. If you try to monitor what your kid is up to using the latest technology, you suck too.

There is nothing 'unfair' about this. The kid is lying to the parents' face.

[mysterio]

Again, you confuse a legitimate use of surveillance on a minor child by his parents (legally responsible for that child, and also the owner of the vehicle) to one where the state uses to abuse and oppress the vast majority of society. They aren't the same. You need to understand the difference

They are exactly the same. Raise a child under constant surveillance, and that child will grow into an adult that expects, even demands the same from government. It's what we are beginning to experience today.