Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: utahagen

"We should concede there may be -- may be, not is - a biological basis for homosexuality, and then we should add, "So what?" There may be a genetic basis for alcoholism, but no (sane) person is arguing that alcoholics should be allowed to show up at work drunk."

And then bare the double-edged sword to this whole silly leftist 'science' project, one that makes the liberals cringe,

"And if they do discover a 'gay gene,' wouldn't that be awful for the gay community? Just imagine all those breeders aborting kids with the gene to ensure grandkids..."

Then they have to decide whether they'd then choose between abortion rights or gay rights. Their heads will explode.


42 posted on 07/10/2006 5:17:20 PM PDT by LibertarianInExile ('Is' and 'amnesty' both have clear, plain meanings. Are Billy Jeff, Pence, McQueeg & Bush related?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


To: LibertarianInExile

You are right! How many "gay", "fat" babies are going to make it out of the womb?


43 posted on 07/10/2006 7:34:01 PM PDT by utahagen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson