Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Valin
"Since al Qaeda is not a state or nation, the conflict in which they were captured was very reasonably characterized as "not of an international character."

What? Is the WOT a "national" conflict? A civil war?
This is, on it's face, absurd.
7 posted on 07/10/2006 11:43:40 AM PDT by Prokopton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Prokopton

"Since al Qaeda is not a state or nation, "


Al-Queda had been trying to establish rule of a country, in each of the nations it had invaded, and attempted to manipulate cooperation through the Islamic religion.

They were in the process of trying to take over Iraq. Saddam had all he could do protecting his palaces and government buildings, and Tikrit.

Al-queda has taken over rule of the outlying provinces, and in the midst of a coup d'etat.

The longterm goal was to take over the world in the name of Islam.

That is 'international character'.


8 posted on 07/10/2006 12:15:47 PM PDT by UCANSEE2 (I will go down with this ship, and I won't put my hands up in surrender.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: Prokopton

"Inter-national" - as in "between nations."


10 posted on 07/10/2006 12:18:44 PM PDT by mvpel (Michael Pelletier)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson