If the publisher were anything but a shill for the lib/socialists, Irey's side would have been printed at the same time...That's called "journalism" - and the "people's right to know" both sides.
Hi, Chip,
Well, just when we thought that Jihad Jack Murtha couldn't get any more despicable, he accuses Diana Irey's husband of war profiteering. Of course, you very helpfully aided and abetted this slime-job by publishing Murtha's ghastly lies. Fine. Seems to me you now have a duty to allow her to respond. Since you obviously have no interest in looking for the other side of this story (your nose having been firmly lodged up Murtha's butt for some time now), I've done the legwork for you. Here's Ms. Irey's rebuttal. [I inserted the link from Diana's site].
If you have any integrity at all, you'll give your readers both sides of the story, not simply the sycophantic drool we've been treated to lately.
No need to thank me. I realize your blithering "reporters" couldn't find this story if they tried. And if they did somehow manage to stumble into it, question is, would you publish it?
Seems unlikely.
Ball's in your court, Mr. Impartial Newshound Editor.