Those worthy of "consideration" from you likely wouldn't get 5% of the vote. Your first paragraph indicates great cluelessness and fanaticism.
Bush is and will be considered by history to be a great president whether that is recognized by you or not.
"Your first paragraph indicates great cluelessness and fanaticism."
I guess you'd find Fred Barnes, Mort Kondracke and Charles Krauthammer clueless and fanatic also. They pretty much agree with my assessment of the degeneration in foreign policy initiatives under Bush's second term - at least with respect to North Korea and seeking U.N. sanctions.
The people who elected Bush first and second time around WANTED a "cowboy" not a Methodist Minister, but it appears its a Methodist Minister we got.
"Those worthy of "consideration" from you likely wouldn't get 5% of the vote."
That's a pretty broad statement.
"Bush is and will be considered by history to be a great president whether that is recognized by you or not."
Its still not too late for Bush to save his legacy by closing the border, ousting illegal invaders, finishing up the siutation in Iraq - more or less - moving on to deal with Iran and Syria and pressuring the Red Chinese and Russians over North Korea.
He HAS left a great legacy in the Federal Courts.
We will just have to wait ........ and pray.