> Both of them addressed Roe and stare decisis.
And both, as memory serves, said that they generally agree with upholding stare decisis. Which means that, for all intents and purposes, they are "pro-choice" in that they wouldn't overturn Row on a whim.
I don't think that Alito said stare decisis was set in stone. He indicated that at the Scotus level it was not sacrosanct.